From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35835 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2015 22:04:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 35819 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2015 22:04:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:04:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF512D8B70; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.35] ([10.10.116.35]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t5QM3wQ4020278; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:03:59 -0400 Message-ID: <558DCC4C.6070101@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:36:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Carlini , Adam Butcher CC: gcc-patches , Patrick Palka Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/65750 References: <1428677840-9034-1-git-send-email-adam@jessamine.co.uk> <552D87F8.90005@redhat.com> <558A8CA0.9090401@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <558A8CA0.9090401@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg02001.txt.bz2 On 06/24/2015 06:55 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > I'm finishing retesting the amended patch and, if everything goes well, > I will apply it to trunk, as approved by Jason (only additional minor > tweak: testcase in cpp0x instead of cpp1y). > > What about gcc-5-branch? It's a regression. I think this is safe enough for the branch. Jason