From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>,
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,
Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] top-level for libvtv: use normal (not raw_cxx) target exports
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55929BFE.8060900@ssi-schaefer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150630125446.GY2856@redhat.com>
On 06/30/2015 02:54 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29/06/15 18:57 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> Actually, an unexpected libstdc++-v3/configure change is introduced by some
>> inconsistency in https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=223196
>> where acinclude.m4 contains different code than the recreated configure:
>>
>> acinclude.m4-3973: case "${target_os}" in
>> acinclude.m4#3974: gnu* | linux* | solaris*)
>> acinclude.m4-3975: GCC_TRY_COMPILE_OR_LINK(
>>
>> configure-79218: case "${target_os}" in
>> configure#79219: gnu* | linux* | kfreebsd*-gnu | knetbsd*-gnu | solaris*)
>> configure-79220: if test x$gcc_no_link = xyes; then
>>
>> Not sure how to handle such kind of inconsistencies though...
>
> That's just a bug, there should be no inconsistency.
Yes, of course.
Though I'm unaware of any current continous integration setup for gcc, it's about
an idea for improvement here - doing something like buildbot-based check here:
Have one buildbot instance enabling maintainer-mode using the predefined autotools
versions, touch all the .in files, and yell if there is some svn diff after bootstrap.
Thanks!
/haubi/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 14:26 Michael Haubenwallner
2015-06-19 9:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-22 16:16 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2015-06-25 19:16 ` Jeff Law
2015-06-29 17:02 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2015-06-30 12:57 ` Jonathan Wakely
2015-06-30 13:46 ` Michael Haubenwallner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55929BFE.8060900@ssi-schaefer.com \
--to=michael.haubenwallner@ssi-schaefer.com \
--cc=Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=cmtice@google.com \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=neroden@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).