From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16222 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2015 20:41:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16206 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jul 2015 20:41:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qk0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 20:41:24 +0000 Received: by qkeo142 with SMTP id o142so93216141qke.1 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:41:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.233.70 with SMTP id e67mr47057515qhc.7.1436042482270; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:19b:400:a983:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48? ([2601:19b:400:a983:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w67sm6641010qha.7.2015.07.04.13.41.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <559844EF.6010208@acm.org> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 20:41:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: GCC Patches Subject: Re: [gomp] Move openacc vector& worker single handling to RTL References: <5597120D.2080308@acm.org> <20150703231159.GP10247@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150703231159.GP10247@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 On 07/03/15 19:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 06:51:57PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> IMHO this is a step towards putting target-dependent handling in the target >> compiler and out of the more generic host-side compiler. >> >> The changelog is separated into 3 parts >> - a) general infrastructure >> - b) additiona >> - c) deletions. >> >> comments? > > Thanks for working on it. > > If the builtins are not meant to be used by users directly (I assume they > aren't) nor have a 1-1 correspondence to a library routine, it is much > better to emit them as internal calls (see internal-fn.{c,def}) instead of > BUILT_IN_NORMAL functions. thanks, Cesar pointed me at the internal builtins too -- I'll take a look. nathan