From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63348 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2015 14:50:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 63324 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2015 14:50:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-HELO: mail-qk0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f178.google.com) (209.85.220.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:50:38 +0000 Received: by qkeo142 with SMTP id o142so164621621qke.1 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 07:50:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.16.157 with SMTP id 29mr16145888qkq.73.1436367036820; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 07:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1000:b012:907b:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48? ([2600:1000:b012:907b:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 71sm1435202qhb.3.2015.07.08.07.50.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Jul 2015 07:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <559D38B9.1080404@acm.org> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:50:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Merrill , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [C++/66443] virtual base of abstract class References: <5591CD50.1040102@acm.org> <559218D8.6080701@redhat.com> <5593247E.5000508@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <5593247E.5000508@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00614.txt.bz2 On 06/30/15 19:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 06/30/15 00:19, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On 06/29/2015 06:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >>> * method.c (synthesized_method_walk): Skip virtual bases of >>> abstract classes in C++14 mode. >> >> Let's not limit this to C++14 mode; most DRs apply to earlier standards as well. curiously opening it up leads to some test failures related to determining the exception specifier for implicit ctors and dtors. Not had time to investigate that yet ... nathan