From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63348 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2015 16:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 63328 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jul 2015 16:11:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.emea.novell.com Received: from mail.emea.novell.com (HELO mail.emea.novell.com) (130.57.118.101) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:11:57 +0000 Received: from EMEA1-MTA by mail.emea.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:11:54 +0100 Message-Id: <55A6A26A020000780009182B@mail.emea.novell.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:20:00 -0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: "GCC Patches" , "Binutils" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix in-tree-binutils builds References: <55A62FD90200007800091184@mail.emea.novell.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01306.txt.bz2 >>> On 15.07.15 at 18:07, wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> --- a/gcc/acinclude.m4 >> +++ b/gcc/acinclude.m4 >> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([_gcc_COMPUTE_GAS_VERSION], >> [gcc_cv_as_bfd_srcdir=3D`echo $srcdir | sed -e 's,/gcc$,,'`/bfd >> for f in $gcc_cv_as_bfd_srcdir/configure \ >> $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/configure \ >> - $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/configure.in \ >> + $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/configure.[ai][cn] \ >> $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/Makefile.in ; do >> gcc_cv_gas_version=3D`sed -n -e 's/^[[ ]]*VERSION=3D[[^0-9A-Z= a-z_]]*\([[0-9]]*\.[[0-9]]*.*\)/VERSION=3D\1/p' < $f` >=20 > How portable is [ai][cn]? I'm not sure - that's why I asked yesterday whether that approach would be acceptable. Jan