From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
To: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/66731 Fix fnmul insn with -frounding-math
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A77844.7000702@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150706102438.GA2102@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]
On 06/07/15 11:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Please make sure in a follow-up patch that the costing logic in
> aarch64_rtx_costs also gets updated.
>
Tested with aarch64-none-linux-gnu cross compiler.
is this OK?
i assume i should backport the fnmul fixes to the gcc-5 branch.
2015-07-16 Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_rtx_costs): Fix NEG cost for FNMUL.
(aarch64_rtx_mult_cost): Fix MULT cost with -frounding-math.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: fnmul-cost.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name=fnmul-cost.diff, Size: 1398 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 6c13a078..1a3d6be 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -5435,11 +5435,17 @@ aarch64_rtx_mult_cost (rtx x, enum rtx_code code, int outer, bool speed)
if (speed)
{
/* Floating-point FMA/FMUL can also support negations of the
- operands. */
- if (GET_CODE (op0) == NEG)
- op0 = XEXP (op0, 0);
- if (GET_CODE (op1) == NEG)
- op1 = XEXP (op1, 0);
+ operands, unless the rounding mode is upward or downward in
+ which case FNMUL is different than FMUL with operand negation. */
+ bool neg0 = GET_CODE (op0) == NEG;
+ bool neg1 = GET_CODE (op1) == NEG;
+ if (compound_p || !flag_rounding_math || (neg0 && neg1))
+ {
+ if (neg0)
+ op0 = XEXP (op0, 0);
+ if (neg1)
+ op1 = XEXP (op1, 0);
+ }
if (compound_p)
/* FMADD/FNMADD/FNMSUB/FMSUB. */
@@ -5956,6 +5962,12 @@ aarch64_rtx_costs (rtx x, machine_mode mode, int outer ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
*cost = rtx_cost (op0, mode, NEG, 0, speed);
return true;
}
+ if (GET_CODE (op0) == MULT)
+ {
+ /* FNMUL. */
+ *cost = rtx_cost (op0, mode, NEG, 0, speed);
+ return true;
+ }
if (speed)
/* FNEG. */
*cost += extra_cost->fp[mode == DFmode].neg;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 8:20 Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-06 10:24 ` James Greenhalgh
2015-07-16 10:11 ` Szabolcs Nagy [this message]
2015-08-04 9:37 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-08-04 9:55 ` James Greenhalgh
2015-07-06 15:39 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2015-07-09 14:40 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-07-15 8:34 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-07-15 9:26 ` Szabolcs Nagy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A77844.7000702@arm.com \
--to=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).