From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68727 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2015 19:59:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 68714 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jul 2015 19:59:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qk0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f174.google.com) (209.85.220.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:59:24 +0000 Received: by qkdv3 with SMTP id v3so76392330qkd.3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:59:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.23.215 with SMTP id 84mr28587413qkx.17.1437163162589; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c000:c497:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48? ([2601:181:c000:c497:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 101sm6391884qkq.41.2015.07.17.12.59.21 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A95E99.7020309@acm.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 20:12:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Merrill , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [C++/66443] virtual base of abstract class References: <5591CD50.1040102@acm.org> <559218D8.6080701@redhat.com> <5593247E.5000508@acm.org> <559D38B9.1080404@acm.org> <55A95AB9.6050105@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <55A95AB9.6050105@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01577.txt.bz2 On 07/17/15 15:42, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 07/08/2015 10:50 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> On 06/30/15 19:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >>> On 06/30/15 00:19, Jason Merrill wrote: >>>> On 06/29/2015 06:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >>>>> * method.c (synthesized_method_walk): Skip virtual bases of >>>>> abstract classes in C++14 mode. >>>> >>>> Let's not limit this to C++14 mode; most DRs apply to earlier >>>> standards as well. >> >> curiously opening it up leads to some test failures related to >> determining the exception specifier for implicit ctors and dtors. Not >> had time to investigate that yet ... > > If C++98 mode is problematic, we can limit this to C++11 and up. I'm not yet sure. The failure mode I saw surprised me, and suggests there's something wrong with the patch. Sadly, I've got interrupted by other stuff. nathan