From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 104461 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2015 12:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103762 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2015 12:19:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qk0-f194.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f194.google.com) (209.85.220.194) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:19:42 +0000 Received: by qkbs7 with SMTP id s7so11825864qkb.3 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:19:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.84.137 with SMTP id l9mr46007982qgd.94.1437394780201; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c000:c497:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48? ([2601:181:c000:c497:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f82sm937310qkf.7.2015.07.20.05.19.38 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gomp4] remove kernel-specific launch To: Tom de Vries , Thomas Schwinge , Nathan Sidwell , Tom de Vries References: <55AB97C0.4080303@acm.org> <87y4ibubyj.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <55AC11B1.4020407@acm.org> <55ACC568.8060503@mentor.com> Cc: GCC Patches From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: <55ACE75A.9070407@acm.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55ACC568.8060503@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01641.txt.bz2 On 07/20/15 05:54, Tom de Vries wrote: > Turning it into an internal fn will make it harder to convert a > GOACC_kernels_internal call into a GOACC_parallel call, which we're doing here I wondered ...