From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
To: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64][6/14] Implement TARGET_OPTION_SAVE/TARGET_OPTION_RESTORE
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AE29C9.50606@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721110904.GA10028@arm.com>
On 21/07/15 12:09, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>> This is a slight respin of this patch, handling the -moverride string more gracefully.
>> We need to explicitly save and restore it in TARGET_OPTION_SAVE otherwise the option gen machinery
>> gets confused about its type and during its printing uses the wrong format code for the pointer, leading to a warning that may trigger during bootstrap.
>>
>> Otherwise it is the same as the previous version.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64.
>> I'd like to propose this version instead of the original.
>>
>> Ok?
> The ChangeLog looks outdated with respect to the patch, in particular:
>
>> (x_aarch64_isa_flags): Likewise.
> This is just "aarch64_isa_flags" in the file.
>
>> +TargetSave
>> +const char *x_aarch64_override_tune_string
>> +
> This is not mentioned.
>
>> (master=): Likewise.
> This doesn't exist.
>
>> +#undef TARGET_OPTION_SAVE
>> +#define TARGET_OPTION_SAVE aarch64_option_save
>> +
> This is not mentioned.
>
> In addition to the ChangeLog nits,
Oops, thanks for catching those, here's an updated one.
2015-07-21 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.opt (explicit_tune_core): New TargetVariable.
(explicit_arch): Likewise.
(aarch64_isa_flags): Likewise.
(x_aarch64_override_tune_string): Likewise.
(mgeneral-regs-only): Mark as Save.
(mfix-cortex-a53-835769): Likewise.
(mcmodel=): Likewise.
(mstrict-align): Likewise.
(momit-leaf-frame-pointer): Likewise.
(mtls-dialect): Likewise.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME): Define.
(aarch64_isa_flags): Remove extern declaration.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_validate_mcpu): Return a bool
to indicate success or failure.
(aarch64_validate_march): Likewise.
(aarch64_validate_mtune): Likewise.
(aarch64_isa_flags): Delete.
(aarch64_override_options_internal): Access opts->x_aarch64_isa_flags
instead of aarch64_isa_flags.
(aarch64_get_tune_cpu): New function.
(aarch64_get_arch): Likewise.
(aarch64_override_options): Use above and set up explicit_tune_core
and explicit_arch.
(aarch64_print_extension): Move earlier in file. Add isa_flags
argument and use that instead of the global aarch64_isa_flags.
(aarch64_option_restore): Likewise.
(aarch64_option_print): Likewise.
(aarch64_declare_function_name): Likewise.
(aarch64_start_file): Delete.
(TARGET_ASM_FILE_START): Do not define.
(TARGET_OPTION_SAVE, TARGET_OPTION_RESTORE, TARGET_OPTION_PRINT):
Define.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_declare_function_name):
Declare prototype.
>
>> +/* Return the CPU corresponding to the enum CPU.
>> + If it doesn't specify a cpu, return the default. */
>> +
>> +static const struct processor *
>> +aarch64_get_tune_cpu (enum aarch64_processor cpu)
>> +{
>> + if (cpu != aarch64_none)
>> + return &all_cores[cpu];
>> +
>> + return &all_cores[TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT & 0x3f];
>> +}
> This looks strange to me, is there nothing we can do to make it clear
> what "0x3f" means in this context, or better yet to get rid of the
> two-in-one variable...
This is due to the cryptic way in which we specify the configure-time
cpu and arch extensions. Perhaps a comment at the default definition of
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT in aarch64.h would partially mitigate the confusion.
Thanks,
Kyrill
>
> OK with a fixed ChangeLog.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-21 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 15:21 Kyrill Tkachov
2015-07-17 14:42 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-07-21 11:14 ` James Greenhalgh
2015-07-21 11:44 ` Kyrill Tkachov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55AE29C9.50606@arm.com \
--to=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).