From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2722 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2015 14:41:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2712 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2015 14:41:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qk0-f180.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f180.google.com) (209.85.220.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:41:45 +0000 Received: by qkbm65 with SMTP id m65so18659475qkb.2 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:41:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.48.11 with SMTP id w11mr69761557qkw.61.1438267303270; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c000:c497:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48? ([2601:181:c000:c497:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f204sm542023qhc.35.2015.07.30.07.41.42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gomp4] Redesign oacc_parallel launch API To: Thomas Schwinge References: <55B7B332.1010603@acm.org> <87a8ufqpxg.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <55B8C619.7040807@acm.org> <55B9497C.9080201@acm.org> Cc: Jakub Jelinek , GCC Patches From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: <55BA37A5.6040205@acm.org> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55B9497C.9080201@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02575.txt.bz2 On 07/29/15 17:45, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 07/29/15 08:24, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> On 07/29/15 05:22, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >>> Likewise for the other torture testing flags. >> >> >> Investigating ... (I've seen those failures be intermittent) > > Interestingly the fails go away with an unoptimized libgomp. I've observed > something vaguely like that before. The observed failure mode was getting stuck > inside the driver library opening the device. Which is very strange. > I am no longer observing the failures.