From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130077 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2015 16:14:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 130068 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2015 16:14:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:14:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFDD19CF3B; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.17] ([10.10.116.17]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6VGENUB003210; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:14:23 -0400 Subject: Re: C++ delayed folding branch review To: Jeff Law , Kai Tietz References: <557A5214.7060106@redhat.com> <1424811417.1214725.1434125493982.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <557BAE5A.7030309@redhat.com> <55B661A1.6090308@redhat.com> <55B911DD.30105@redhat.com> <55BA5667.9040200@redhat.com> <55BAE20A.1070400@redhat.com> Cc: Kai Tietz , gcc-patches List From: Jason Merrill Message-ID: <55BB9EDB.8030305@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:26:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55BAE20A.1070400@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02684.txt.bz2 On 07/30/2015 10:48 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Note, anything outside of the C/C++ front-ends depending on that > canonicalization done by shorten_compare is, IMHO, broken. I think the OMP code isn't relying on it being done by shorten_compare; it's trying to do it itself in c_finish_omp_for but is somehow thwarted by delayed folding. Jason