From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-404934-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18617 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2015 15:14:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18599 invoked by uid 89); 10 Aug 2015 15:14:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:14:14 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 318A933D9B0;	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-35.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.35])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7AFECcn004866;	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:14:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
To: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>,        Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
References: <orio9cw10j.fsf@livre.home> <CAFiYyc3k9xh_6RGbTdHYOJ-aEmUWVeFRoWy=YzCHFDNSdtTXCA@mail.gmail.com> <orwpxqvqnp.fsf@livre.home> <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> <CAMe9rOpR+2gPxo0tKaRPtcML_Q4=r-_=9iqk+_JZFPkM=eN=BQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOpbLEyDexVJqJAFJ3W6o4AktNog-jwk2CY4GZkrmT+nfA@mail.gmail.com> <or4mkmhgc9.fsf@livre.home> <CAMe9rOp=S5fu1N=i7waswCYqJeLBCrySqYdFYkVa7LV04vpQSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOrq+ZBAg1nZ1twEcPqwBj4j9+XA+SXQJVWWzjfdvidjtw@mail.gmail.com> <or1tfkdjhj.fsf@livre.home> <20150810082355.GA31149@arm.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,        Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,        Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>,        David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,        Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <55C8BFC3.3030603@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:14:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150810082355.GA31149@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2

On 08/10/2015 02:23 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:45:28AM +0100, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jul 30, 2015, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> aoliva/pr64164  is fine on x32.
>>
>> Thanks.  I have made a large number of changes since you tested it,
>> fixing all the reported issues and then some.  Now, x86_64-linux-gnu
>> (-m64 and -m32), i686-pc-linux-gnu, powerpc64-linux-gnu and
>> powerpc64el-linux-gnu pass regstrap (r226317), and the many tens of
>> targets I cross-tested still get the same 'make all' errors that the
>> pristine tree did.
>
> For what it is worth, I bootstrapped and tested the consolidated patch
> on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and aarch64-none-linux-gnu with trunk at
> r226516 over the weekend, and didn't see any new issues.
Thanks -- I know it's been a long road on this patch.  I don't think 
anyone would have ever guessed fixing 64164 would be so complex.

jeff