From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62122 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2015 15:01:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62057 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2015 15:01:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (HELO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com) (207.82.80.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:01:45 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-2-Em5FtRWWS7G_NE1T16K3yw-1; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:01:40 +0100 Received: from [10.2.207.50] ([10.1.2.79]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:01:40 +0100 Message-ID: <55D49A54.2050300@arm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:02:00 -0000 From: Kyrill Tkachov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GCC Patches Subject: [PATCH][AArch64][obvious] Remove obsolete comment in aarch64-option-extensions.def X-MC-Unique: Em5FtRWWS7G_NE1T16K3yw-1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010409030705060806060904" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg01097.txt.bz2 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010409030705060806060904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 508 Hi all, This comment in aarch64-option-extensions.def seems obsolete and to me is m= ore confusing than helpful. The entries in that file are not "example" extensions, they have a real mea= ning, and they are not templates for adding new CPUs anyway (not sure that ever made sense). This patch removes that comment. Committed as obvious with r227011. Thanks, Kyrill 2015-08-19 Kyrylo Tkachov * config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def: Delete obsolete comment. --------------010409030705060806060904 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=aarch64-ext-comment.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="aarch64-ext-comment.patch" Content-length: 1225 commit 4de4c2a8d80eb49384cbd6c1746e0ce87ea3bbb4 Author: Kyrylo Tkachov Date: Wed Aug 19 13:51:58 2015 +0100 [AArch64][obvious] Remove obsolete comment in aarch64-option-extensions= .def diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def b/gcc/config/= aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def index 1762cc8..b261a0f 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def @@ -34,11 +34,6 @@ should contain a whitespace-separated list of the strings in 'Features' that are required. Their order is not important. */ =20 -/* V8 Architecture Extensions. - This list currently contains example extensions for CPUs that implement - AArch64, and therefore serves as a template for adding more CPUs in the - future. */ - AARCH64_OPT_EXTENSION("fp", AARCH64_FL_FP, AARCH6= 4_FL_FPSIMD | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO | AARCH64_FL_RDMA, "fp") AARCH64_OPT_EXTENSION("simd", AARCH64_FL_FPSIMD, AARC= H64_FL_SIMD | AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO | AARCH64_FL_RDMA, "asimd") AARCH64_OPT_EXTENSION("crypto", AARCH64_FL_CRYPTO | AARCH64_FL_FPSIMD, AA= RCH64_FL_CRYPTO, "aes pmull sha1 sha2") --------------010409030705060806060904--