From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5423 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2015 15:08:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5410 invoked by uid 89); 28 Aug 2015 15:08:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (HELO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com) (146.101.78.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:08:19 +0000 Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-21-Yms28lY5QR-85dgi706Fsw-1; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:08:15 +0100 Received: from [10.2.207.65] ([10.1.2.79]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:08:14 +0100 Message-ID: <55E0795E.8060009@arm.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:17:00 -0000 From: Alan Lawrence User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Lawrence CC: Richard Biener , Christophe Lyon , "martin.jambor@suse.cz" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Jeff Law Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] completely_scalarize arrays as well as records References: <20150825214232.GB12831@virgil.suse.cz> <1440690217-24461-1-git-send-email-alan.lawrence@arm.com> <55E03315.7080205@arm.com> <55E0697D.2010008@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <55E0697D.2010008@arm.com> X-MC-Unique: Yms28lY5QR-85dgi706Fsw-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg01793.txt.bz2 Alan Lawrence wrote: >=20 > Right. I think VLA's are the problem with pr64312.C also. I'm testing a f= ix=20 > (that declares arrays with any of these properties as unscalarizable). >=20 > Monday is a bank holiday in UK and so I expect to get back to you on Tues= day. >=20 > --Alan In the meantime I've reverted the patch pending further testing on x86, aar= ch64=20 and arm. --Alan