From: Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PR65637][PATCH][5/5] Handle 2 preds for fin_bb in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E44271.1050403@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552E6643.8090002@mentor.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5004 bytes --]
[ was: Re: [PR65637][PATCH][3/3] Handle 2 preds for fin_bb in
expand_omp_for_static_chunk ]
On 15/04/15 15:23, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch series fixes PR65637.
>>
<SNIP>
> This patch fixes compilation of autopar/reduc-3.c in
> expand_omp_for_static_chunk.
>
> We encounter two situations in expand_omp_for_static_chunk:
> 1. single_pred_p (fin_bb)
> This situation happens for f.i. autopar-1.c, which uses a compile-time
> constant loop bound.
> 2. !single_pred_p (fin_bb)
> This situation happens for autopar/reduc-3.c, which uses a compile-time
> unknown loop bound.
>
> The two situations are represented as control flow graphs here:
> ...
> 1.
> x
> |
> |
> *
> entry_bb
> |
> |
> *
> iter_part_bb --* seq_start_bb
> | * |
> | \ ...
> * \ |
> fin_bb \ *
> | -- trip_update_bb
> |
> *
> x
>
> 2.
> x
> |
> |
> *
> region.entry --* entry_bb
> | |
> | |
> * *
> fin_bb *-- iter_part_bb --* seq_start_bb
> | * |
> | \ ...
> * \ |
> x \ *
> -- trip_update_bb
> ...
>
> This patch handles the !single_pred_p (fin_bb) scenario, while keeping the
> single_pred_p (fin_bb) scenario undisturbed.
>
> With the patch, the resulting split-off function looks like this:
> ...
> main1._loopfn.0 (voidD.41 * .paral_data_paramD.2498)
> {
> ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 79, maybe hot
> ;; prev block 0, next block 3, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
> ;; pred: ENTRY (FALLTHRU)
> .paral_data_param_2 = .paral_data_param_1(D);
> .paral_data_load.12_3 = (struct *) .paral_data_param_2;
> # VUSE <.MEM_33(D)>
> _4 = .paral_data_load.12_3->D.2490;
> # VUSE <.MEM_33(D)>
> ub_5 = .paral_data_load.12_3->ubD.2491;
> # VUSE <.MEM_33(D)>
> uc_6 = .paral_data_load.12_3->ucD.2492;
> if (0 < _4)
> goto <bb 4>;
> else
> goto <bb 3>;
> ;; succ: 4 [100.0%] (TRUE_VALUE)
> ;; 3 [0.0%] (FALSE_VALUE)
>
> ;; basic block 3, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
> ;; prev block 2, next block 4, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
> ;; pred: 2 [0.0%] (FALSE_VALUE)
> ;; 5 (FALSE_VALUE)
> # udiff.8_7 = PHI <0(2), udiff.8_8(5)>
> _9 = &.paral_data_load.12_3->udiff.8D.2493;
> # .MEM_34 = VDEF <.MEM_33(D)>
> # USE = anything
> # CLB = anything
> __atomic_fetch_add_4D.1247 (_9, udiff.8_7, 0);
> # VUSE <.MEM_34>
> return;
> ;; succ: EXIT
>
> ;; basic block 4, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 79, maybe hot
> ;; prev block 3, next block 5, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
> ;; pred: 2 [100.0%] (TRUE_VALUE)
> _10 = omp_get_num_threadsD.1287 ();
> _11 = (unsigned int) _10;
> _12 = omp_get_thread_numD.1286 ();
> _13 = (unsigned int) _12;
> .trip.13_14 = 0;
> ;; succ: 5 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
>
> ;; basic block 5, loop depth 1, count 0, freq 79, maybe hot
> ;; prev block 4, next block 6, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
> ;; pred: 4 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
> ;; 8 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
> # udiff.8_8 = PHI <0(4), udiff.8_15(8)>
> # .trip.13_16 = PHI <.trip.13_14(4), .trip.13_17(8)>
> _18 = _11 * .trip.13_16;
> _19 = _13 + _18;
> _20 = _19 + 1;
> _21 = MIN_EXPR <_4, _20>;
> if (_19 < _4)
> goto <bb 6>;
> else
> goto <bb 3>;
> ;; succ: 6 [100.0%] (TRUE_VALUE)
> ;; 3 (FALSE_VALUE)
>
> ;; basic block 6, loop depth 1, count 0, freq 79, maybe hot
> ;; prev block 5, next block 7, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
> ;; pred: 5 [100.0%] (TRUE_VALUE)
> ivtmp_22 = _19;
> ;; succ: 7 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
>
> ;; basic block 7, loop depth 2, count 0, freq 7920, maybe hot
> ;; prev block 6, next block 8, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
> ;; pred: 6 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
> ;; 7 [100.0%] (TRUE_VALUE)
> # udiff.8_23 = PHI <udiff.8_8(6), udiff.8_15(7)>
> # ivtmp_24 = PHI <ivtmp_22(6), ivtmp_25(7)>
> i.9_28 = (intD.6) ivtmp_24;
> # VUSE <.MEM_33(D)>
> _29 = *ub_5[i.9_28];
> # VUSE <.MEM_33(D)>
> _30 = *uc_6[i.9_28];
> _31 = _29 - _30;
> udiff.8_15 = udiff.8_23 + _31;
> i.9_32 = i.9_28 + 1;
> ivtmp_25 = ivtmp_24 + 1;
> if (ivtmp_25 < _21)
> goto <bb 7>;
> else
> goto <bb 8>;
> ;; succ: 7 [100.0%] (TRUE_VALUE)
> ;; 8 (FALSE_VALUE)
>
> ;; basic block 8, loop depth 1, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot
> ;; prev block 7, next block 1, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
> ;; pred: 7 (FALSE_VALUE)
> .trip.13_17 = .trip.13_16 + 1;
> goto <bb 5>;
> ;; succ: 5 [100.0%] (FALLTHRU)
>
> }
> ...
>
OK for trunk?
This updated patch includes a test-case.
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 0005-Handle-2-preds-for-fin_bb-in-expand_omp_for_static_c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4593 bytes --]
Handle 2 preds for fin_bb in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
2015-08-31 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
PR tree-optimization/65637
* omp-low.c (expand_omp_for_static_chunk): Handle case that fin_bb has 2
predecessors.
* gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3-chunk-size.c: New test.
---
gcc/ChangeLog | 6 +++
gcc/omp-low.c | 26 +++++++----
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3-chunk-size.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3-chunk-size.c
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index a14564c..c9e426f 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
2015-05-18 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
PR tree-optimization/65637
+ * omp-low.c (expand_omp_for_static_chunk): Handle case that fin_bb has 2
+ predecessors.
+
+2015-05-18 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/65637
* omp-low.c (find_phi_with_arg_on_edge): New function.
(expand_omp_for_static_chunk): Fix inner loop phi.
diff --git a/gcc/omp-low.c b/gcc/omp-low.c
index e2be7c7..f3257ac 100644
--- a/gcc/omp-low.c
+++ b/gcc/omp-low.c
@@ -7033,7 +7033,7 @@ expand_omp_for_static_chunk (struct omp_region *region,
se->probability = REG_BR_PROB_BASE / 2000 - 1;
if (gimple_in_ssa_p (cfun))
{
- int dest_idx = find_edge (entry_bb, fin_bb)->dest_idx;
+ int dest_idx = find_edge (iter_part_bb, fin_bb)->dest_idx;
for (gphi_iterator gpi = gsi_start_phis (fin_bb);
!gsi_end_p (gpi); gsi_next (&gpi))
{
@@ -7314,7 +7314,7 @@ expand_omp_for_static_chunk (struct omp_region *region,
/* When we redirect the edge from trip_update_bb to iter_part_bb, we
remove arguments of the phi nodes in fin_bb. We need to create
appropriate phi nodes in iter_part_bb instead. */
- se = single_pred_edge (fin_bb);
+ se = find_edge (iter_part_bb, fin_bb);
re = single_succ_edge (trip_update_bb);
vec<edge_var_map> *head = redirect_edge_var_map_vector (re);
ene = single_succ_edge (entry_bb);
@@ -7329,6 +7329,10 @@ expand_omp_for_static_chunk (struct omp_region *region,
phi = psi.phi ();
t = gimple_phi_result (phi);
gcc_assert (t == redirect_edge_var_map_result (vm));
+
+ if (!single_pred_p (fin_bb))
+ t = copy_ssa_name (t, phi);
+
nphi = create_phi_node (t, iter_part_bb);
t = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, se);
@@ -7353,16 +7357,20 @@ expand_omp_for_static_chunk (struct omp_region *region,
gcc_assert (inner_loop_phi != NULL);
add_phi_arg (inner_loop_phi, gimple_phi_result (nphi),
find_edge (seq_start_bb, body_bb), locus);
+
+ if (!single_pred_p (fin_bb))
+ add_phi_arg (phi, gimple_phi_result (nphi), se, locus);
}
gcc_assert (gsi_end_p (psi) && (head == NULL || i == head->length ()));
redirect_edge_var_map_clear (re);
- while (1)
- {
- psi = gsi_start_phis (fin_bb);
- if (gsi_end_p (psi))
- break;
- remove_phi_node (&psi, false);
- }
+ if (single_pred_p (fin_bb))
+ while (1)
+ {
+ psi = gsi_start_phis (fin_bb);
+ if (gsi_end_p (psi))
+ break;
+ remove_phi_node (&psi, false);
+ }
/* Make phi node for trip. */
phi = create_phi_node (trip_main, iter_part_bb);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3-chunk-size.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3-chunk-size.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca4ab2f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3-chunk-size.c
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 -fdump-tree-parloops-details -fdump-tree-optimized --param parloops-chunk-size=100" } */
+
+#include <stdarg.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#define N 1600
+
+unsigned int ub[N];
+unsigned int uc[N];
+
+/* Reduction of unsigned-int. */
+
+int __attribute__ ((noinline))
+main1 (int n, int res)
+{
+ int i;
+ unsigned int udiff;
+
+ udiff = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ udiff += (ub[i] - uc[i]);
+ }
+
+ /* check results: */
+ if (udiff != res)
+ abort ();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+init_arrays ()
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ {
+ ub[i] = i * 3;
+ uc[i] = i;
+ }
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ init_arrays ();
+ main1 (N, 2558400);
+ main1 (N-1, 2555202);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Detected reduction" 1 "parloops" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SUCCESS: may be parallelized" 2 "parloops" } } */
+
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 13:10 [PR65637] Fix ssa-handling code " Tom de Vries
2015-04-15 13:15 ` [PR65637][PATCH][1/3] Fix gcc_assert " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 12:00 ` [PR65637][PATCH][3/5] " Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 9:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-15 13:17 ` [PR65637][PATCH][2/3] Fix inner loop phi " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 12:03 ` [PR65637][PATCH][4/5] " Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 9:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-15 13:23 ` [PR65637][PATCH][3/3] Handle 2 preds for fin_bb " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 12:26 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2015-09-03 9:40 ` [PR65637][PATCH][5/5] " Jakub Jelinek
2015-05-18 13:13 ` [PING][PR65637] Fix ssa-handling code " Tom de Vries
2015-05-18 14:19 ` Tom de Vries
2015-06-08 12:34 ` [PING^2][PR65637] " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 11:44 ` [PR65637] " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 11:51 ` [PATCH][1/5] Add param parloops-chunk-size Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 8:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-08-31 11:55 ` [PATCH][2/5] Handle simple latch bb in expand_omp_for_static_chunk Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 9:02 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E44271.1050403@mentor.com \
--to=tom_devries@mentor.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).