From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110218 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2015 19:52:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110207 invoked by uid 89); 29 Sep 2015 19:52:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:52:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54FCA91581; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-7-199.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.199]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t8TJqHRP010407; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:52:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Fold acc_on_device To: Nathan Sidwell References: <560AD6A6.4050109@acm.org> Cc: GCC Patches , Jakub Jelinek From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <560AEBF1.4070208@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560AD6A6.4050109@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg02256.txt.bz2 On 09/29/2015 08:21 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > This patch folds acc_on_device as a regular builtin, but postponed until > we know which compiler we're in. As suggested by Bernd, we use the > existing builtin folding machinery. > > Trunk is still using the older PTX runtime scheme (Thomas is working on > that), so the only change there is in the host-side libgomp piece. > > Ok for trunk? Ok, although I really don't quite see the need to drop the expander. Bernd