From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67739 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2015 09:27:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 67723 invoked by uid 89); 1 Oct 2015 09:27:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:27:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC1391E90 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-5-139.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.139]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t919RcZL008610 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:27:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new hooks ASM_OUTPUT_START_FUNCTION_HEADER ... To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20150921113158.GA30365@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5601B25F.7020501@redhat.com> <20150923144851.GA22727@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5603D354.5030404@redhat.com> <20150924134823.GA5142@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <56054D44.9000709@redhat.com> <20150928094447.GC4149@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <56092A69.5090802@redhat.com> <20151001063010.GA3783@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <560CFC89.8090608@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151001063010.GA3783@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On 10/01/2015 08:30 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: >> However, you probably should add a sentence or two to >> the documentation to specify ordering wrt other parts of the header >> of a function. > > Any suggestions where that information should be placed in the > documentation? Just in the hook definition. Bernd