From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59691 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2015 17:12:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59681 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2015 17:12:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:12:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3AC8AEF2D; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-105.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.105]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t92HCM8M019982; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:12:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert SPARC to LRA To: Segher Boessenkool References: <20150908.214115.1585933992134500164.davem@davemloft.net> <2D64499C-B66A-4873-BDB9-C6190FF539FE@comcast.net> <56089802.7010803@redhat.com> <560993B9.70105@redhat.com> <20150928202838.GA1401@gate.crashing.org> <560A9583.5070102@redhat.com> <560B514F.2070000@redhat.com> <560BFC85.7020909@redhat.com> <20150930161523.GA20828@gate.crashing.org> Cc: Vladimir Makarov , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <560EBAF6.60701@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:12:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150930161523.GA20828@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 On 09/30/2015 10:15 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:15:17AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >>> I guess the support of cc0 can be implemented for reasonable amount of >>> time. It is just a priority issue. I still have a lot PRs for the >>> targets already using LRA. >> I wouldn't suggest making cc0 support a significant priority. I'd be >> more likely to push for deprecating cc0 targets first. > > It looks like most cc0 targets would be pretty easy to convert, if anyone > can do testing anyway ;-) v850, h8300 and m68k are all testable. The first two via traditional simulators, the latter via aranym. I just haven't seen the benefit for converting them outweighing the time, so I haven't tried. If you wanted to take a stab (and I'm sure the v850 would be easiest), I'll sign up for the regression testing & debugging. Jeff