From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94657 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2015 14:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94641 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2015 14:05:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:05:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95827AB966; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-4-126.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.126]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t98E5CB1024145; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:05:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH ARM]: PR67745: Fix function alignment after __attribute__ 2/2 To: Christian Bruel , "law@redhat.com" References: <560A90F2.5010708@st.com> <560C31CD.7060009@redhat.com> <560CDCD7.9080108@st.com> <560D5B36.2020600@st.com> <5614C412.5080400@st.com> <5614F17B.5060402@redhat.com> <5614F7D0.8010409@st.com> <56155841.6000404@redhat.com> <56167745.1080409@st.com> Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com" , "kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com" , "richard.earnshaw@arm.com" From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <56167818.8070503@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56167745.1080409@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00840.txt.bz2 On 10/08/2015 04:01 PM, Christian Bruel wrote: > OK, Similar pattern occurs at many other places, that changed also in > the attached proposal. > Not fully tested (in particular the java part) and no ChangeLog. Just to > make sure that we agree on the interface first. That looks like a plain diff rather than context or unified, which is very hard to read, but I think this is the approach I was looking for. Well done spotting the other places. Bernd