From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75272 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2015 12:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 75255 invoked by uid 89); 13 Oct 2015 12:41:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNSUBSCRIBE_BODY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailout1.samsung.com Received: from mailout1.samsung.com (HELO mailout1.samsung.com) (203.254.224.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:41:12 +0000 Received: from epcpsbgm2new.samsung.com (epcpsbgm2 [203.254.230.27]) by mailout1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NW501M27SKKRP30@mailout1.samsung.com> for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:41:08 +0900 (KST) Received: from epmmp2 ( [203.254.227.17]) by epcpsbgm2new.samsung.com (EPCPMTA) with SMTP id 96.A4.18629.4EBFC165; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:41:08 +0900 (KST) Received: from [106.109.129.227] by mmp2.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0NW500I7WSKIS230@mmp2.samsung.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:41:08 +0900 (KST) Subject: Re: Fix prototype for print_insn in rtl.h To: Jeff Law , GCC Patches References: <561CBEF8.3040300@samsung.com> <561CF795.8010502@redhat.com> Cc: maltsevm@gmail.com From: Nikolai Bozhenov Message-id: <561CFBE1.8080406@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:41:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <561CF795.8010502@redhat.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01232.txt.bz2 On 10/13/2015 03:22 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/13/2015 02:21 AM, Nikolai Bozhenov wrote: >> Currently prototype for print_insn in rtl.h doesn't match it's >> definition in sched-vis.c The patch fixes this mismatch. > I'll run this through the usual bootstrap & regression testing before > installing later today. > jeff > I've bootstrapped it on x86_64, but I don't see much sense in regression testing this patch cause it's so small. Though, if you think it's necessary, I can test it myself and write to you when I get the results. Thanks, Nikolai