From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8637 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2015 13:02:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8627 invoked by uid 89); 13 Oct 2015 13:02:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNSUBSCRIBE_BODY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:02:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238AC33048B; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-105.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.105]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9DD2AjD002626; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:02:10 -0400 Subject: Re: Fix prototype for print_insn in rtl.h To: Nikolai Bozhenov , GCC Patches References: <561CBEF8.3040300@samsung.com> <561CF795.8010502@redhat.com> <561CFBE1.8080406@samsung.com> Cc: maltsevm@gmail.com From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <561D00D2.4000605@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <561CFBE1.8080406@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01241.txt.bz2 On 10/13/2015 06:41 AM, Nikolai Bozhenov wrote: > On 10/13/2015 03:22 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 10/13/2015 02:21 AM, Nikolai Bozhenov wrote: >>> Currently prototype for print_insn in rtl.h doesn't match it's >>> definition in sched-vis.c The patch fixes this mismatch. >> I'll run this through the usual bootstrap & regression testing before >> installing later today. >> jeff >> > I've bootstrapped it on x86_64, but I don't see much sense in regression > testing this patch cause it's so small. Though, if you think it's > necessary, > I can test it myself and write to you when I get the results. It's standard procedure. While I agree that a bootstrap is almost certainly sufficient here, it's not a big deal to add this to the regression run I set up to run while getting the kids ready for school :-) jeff