From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23803 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2015 15:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23792 invoked by uid 89); 13 Oct 2015 15:36:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:35:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7605536B4DE; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-105.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.105]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9DFZvMd007216; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [[Boolean Vector, patch 5/5] Support boolean vectors in vector lowering To: Ilya Enkovich , Alan Lawrence References: <20151002141102.GI26618@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com> <56182B28.6050802@redhat.com> <561B8D69.8070001@arm.com> Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <561D24DC.9000409@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01268.txt.bz2 On 10/13/2015 08:56 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: > 2015-10-12 13:37 GMT+03:00 Alan Lawrence : >> On 09/10/15 22:01, Jeff Law wrote: >> >>> So my question for the series as a whole is whether or not we need to do >>> something for the other languages, particularly Fortran. I was a bit >>> surprised to see this stuff bleed into the C/C++ front-ends and >>> obviously wonder if it's bled into Fortran, Ada, Java, etc. >> >> >> Isn't that just because, we have GNU extensions to C/C++, for vectors? I >> admit I don't know enough Ada/Fortran to know whether we've added GNU >> extensions to those languages as well... >> >> A. > > I also got an impression only GNU vector extensions should be > affected. And those are for C/C++ only. I'd be surprised if Fortran doesn't have vector capabilities. I think some sanity checking in there would be wise. jeff