public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@st.com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>, "law@redhat.com" <law@redhat.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: refactoring TARGET_PTRMEMFUNC_VBIT_LOCATION checks
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5620D751.3000707@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5620D5FA.8010904@st.com>



On 10/16/2015 12:48 PM, Christian Bruel wrote:
>
>
> On 10/16/2015 11:44 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 10/16/2015 10:01 AM, Christian Bruel wrote:
>>> -
>>> -  if (TARGET_PTRMEMFUNC_VBIT_LOCATION == ptrmemfunc_vbit_in_pfn
>>> -      && DECL_ALIGN (fn) < 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT)
>>> -    DECL_ALIGN (fn) = 2 * BITS_PER_UNIT;
>>> -
>>> +  DECL_ALIGN (fn) = MINIMUM_METHOD_BOUNDARY;
>>
>> This looks like a change in behaviour. You want to use the max of M_M_B
>> and the current alignment.
>>
>  > Bernd
>  >
>
> I'm not sure. at each point of the macro, we have the current alignment
> == FUNCTION_BOUNDARY, because we are just returning from the sequence
> build_lang_decl/make_node
>
> so it looks like
>
>    DECL_ALIGN (fn) = MAX (MINIMUM_METHOD_BOUNDARY, DECL_ALIGN (fn))
>
> would be redundant with just
>
>    DECL_ALIGN (fn) = MINIMUM_METHOD_BOUNDARY
>
> did I miss something ?

maybe I realized that it was not clear that the MAX is part of the MMB 
macro that returns MAX (FUNCTION_BOUNDARY, 2 * BITS_PER_UNITS)


>
>
>>
>> Bernd
>>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-16 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-29 13:44 [PATCH ARM]: PR67745: Fix function alignment after __attribute__ 2/2 Christian Bruel
2015-09-29 13:59 ` Christian Bruel
2015-09-30 19:30 ` Jeff Law
2015-10-01  7:12   ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-01 16:11     ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-07  7:05       ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-07 10:18         ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-07 10:45           ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-07 17:37             ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-07 17:50               ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-08 13:14                 ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-08 13:20                   ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-08 13:51                     ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-08 14:30                       ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-12 10:56                         ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-12 11:19                           ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-12 11:26                             ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-16  8:03                             ` refactoring TARGET_PTRMEMFUNC_VBIT_LOCATION checks Christian Bruel
2015-10-16  9:47                               ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-16 10:50                                 ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-16 10:56                                   ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-16 10:56                                   ` Christian Bruel [this message]
2015-10-13  8:03                           ` [PATCH ARM]: PR67745: Fix function alignment after __attribute__ 2/2 Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-10-13 10:18                             ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-16 14:18                             ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-08 14:01               ` Christian Bruel
2015-10-08 14:05                 ` Bernd Schmidt
2015-10-07 17:40         ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5620D751.3000707@st.com \
    --to=christian.bruel@st.com \
    --cc=bschmidt@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).