From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83779 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2015 13:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 83766 invoked by uid 89); 16 Oct 2015 13:59:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailout1.w1.samsung.com Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com (HELO mailout1.w1.samsung.com) (210.118.77.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:59:28 +0000 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NWB00GK6G708H90@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:59:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from eusync4.samsung.com ( [203.254.199.214]) by eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id 80.DF.05269.BB201265; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:59:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from [106.109.128.167] by eusync4.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0NWB00A5NG6YWL10@eusync4.samsung.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:59:23 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Libsanitizer merge from upstream r249633. To: Renato Golin References: <561CE769.6050800@partner.samsung.com> <561CE7BA.5070805@partner.samsung.com> <561D3749.8080501@partner.samsung.com> <20151014075410.GU478@tucnak.redhat.com> <561E98E5.5000506@linaro.org> Cc: Evgenii Stepanov , Adhemerval Zanella , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" From: Maxim Ostapenko Message-id: <562102AC.2020502@partner.samsung.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01605.txt.bz2 On 16/10/15 16:48, Renato Golin wrote: > On 14 October 2015 at 19:38, Renato Golin wrote: >> On 14 October 2015 at 19:21, Evgenii Stepanov wrote: >>> Wait. As Jakub correctly pointed out in the other thread, there is no >>> obvious reason why there could not be a single shadow offset value >>> that would work for all 3 possible VMA settings. I suggest figuring >>> this out first. >> We are. > For anyone interested, here are the first few reviews: > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D13781 > http://reviews.llvm.org/D13782 > > There's more coming... :) > > I don't want to spam this list for all the future patches, so if > you're interested, you might monitor the LLVM list, or register in our > Phabricator and create a filter for reviews with "VMA" to always CC > you. > > cheers, > --renato > Yeah, thanks. Just wondering if I should step back until they are resolved upstream or we can have another merge in the future (stage3 is coming ...)? -Maxim