From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80022 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2015 15:42:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79995 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2015 15:42:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:42:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DA627BE563; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:42:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y16-o0SUWEXc; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:42:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.40.126] (nat.gnat.com [205.232.38.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 793A127BE3B9; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:42:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: GCC 6 Status Report (2015-10-16) To: Richard Biener References: Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat Message-ID: <562660C9.4010900@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01897.txt.bz2 Hi Richard, On 10/16/2015 05:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > This means it is time to get things you want to have in GCC 6 finalized > and reviewed. As usual there may be exceptions to late reviewed features > but don't count on that. Likewise target specific features can sneak in > during Stage 3 if maintainers ok them. This is just to point out I have series of DWARF-related patches awaiting reviews for several months. I plan to rebase against trunk, retest and resubmit them shortly but here’s an overview: * The patch series for transition to standard DWARF for Ada (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01857.html). There are 8 patches, each one depending on the previous one, except the 6/8 one (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01361.html) which could go on its own. * Fix DW_AT_static_link generation in DWARF (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01855.html). The corresponding support in GDB is in the development branch. * Track indirect calls as call site information in DWARF (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01856.html). * Materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations in DWARF (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01854.html). The corresponding support in GDB is in the development branch. If there is anything I should do to ease the review process, please let me know. :-) Thank you in advance! -- Pierre-Marie de Rodat