From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18757 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2015 19:27:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18734 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2015 19:27:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:27:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179DB341ADA for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-196.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.196]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9SJREl2012670; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:27:14 -0400 Subject: Re: RFA (Makefiles): PATCH to include libcpp and libiberty in GCC etags To: Jason Merrill , gcc-patches List References: <563118B1.50001@redhat.com> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <56312192.1070903@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <563118B1.50001@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg03102.txt.bz2 On 10/28/2015 12:49 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > Periodically I try to use M-. to pull up a function from libcpp and am > frustrated that it doesn't work. This patch fixes that, and throws in > libiberty for good measure. > > I also considered using --include for the TAGS files in those > directories, but that would require people to 'make TAGS' separately in > those directories for it to work, so I decided to go this way instead. > > OK for trunk? Looks like you attached the wrong patch :-) Jeff