From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23804 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2012 19:18:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 23790 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2012 19:18:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:18:16 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6QJICnL011658; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:18:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120726190147.GB1956@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org> References: <20120726190147.GB1956@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <563189A5-A14A-4676-8A59-F6AC8BB45F73@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, meissner@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [rs6000 0/3] POWER removal Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:18:00 -0000 To: Michael Meissner X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg01358.txt.bz2 > Note, you will need to update the copyright to include 2012 for the > files that > have not been modified in this year. I think you looked at the old version of the patch I mailed to you privately; this is fixed already (there are some other small differences as well). > In running parallel tests for both 64-bit and 32-bit, I see 3 > differences: > > gcc.dg/pr42389.c Trunk fails, Segher passes for 64-bit > gcc.dg/pr46521.c Trunk fails, Segher passes for 64-bit > gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr45354.c Trunk passes, Segher fails for 64-bit > > gcc.dg/pr45352-1.c Trunk passes, Segher fails for 32-bit > gcc.dg/pr46522.c Trunk passes, Segher fails for 32-bit > gcc.dg/pr48144.c Trunk fails, Segher passes for 32-bit > gcc.dg/pr50205.c Trunk passes, Segher fails for 32-bit > gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr45354.c Trunk fails, Segher passes for 32-bit > > gfortran.dg/pr44691.f Trunk fails, Segher passes for 64-bit > > Now, all of these differences are in tests that do selective > scheduling, so I'm > not sure they are blockers. As I said, all of these fail in the latest PowerPC results on gcc-testresults (it's an ICE in free_regset_pool, there is no PR for it it seems, but is is mentioned in PR53957 comment #9). Segher