public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@foss.arm.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@foss.arm.com>,
	Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR67305, tighten neon_vector_mem_operand on eliminable registers
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56432FED.7030406@foss.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5639D3A8.5040606@foss.arm.com>


On 04/11/15 09:45, Jiong Wang wrote:
> As discussed at the bugzilla
>
>   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67305
>
> neon_vector_mem_operand is broken.  As the comments says
> "/* Reject eliminable registers.  */", the code block at the head
> of this function which checks eliminable registers is designed to do
> early reject only, there shouldn't be any early accept.
>
> If this code hunk doesn't reject the incoming rtx, then the rtx pattern
> should still go through all default checks below. All other similar
> functions, thumb1_legitimate_address_p, arm_coproc_mem_operand,
> neon_struct_mem_operand etc are exactly follow this check flow.
>
> So as Jim Wilson commented on the bugzilla, instead of "return !strict",
> we need to only do the check if strict be true, and only does rejection
> which means return FALSE, for all other cases, we need to go through
> those normal checks below.
>
> neon_vector_mem_operand is only used by several misalign pattern, I
> guess that's why this bug is not exposed for long time.
>
> boostrap & regression OK on armv8 aarch32, ok for trunk?
>
> 2015-11-04  Jiong Wang  <jiong.wang@arm.com>
>             Jim Wilson  <wilson@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> gcc/
>   PR target/67305
>   * config/arm/arm.md (neon_vector_mem_operand): Return FALSE if strict
>   be true and eliminable registers mentioned.
>
Ping ~

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-04  9:45 Jiong Wang
2015-11-04 22:39 ` Jim Wilson
2015-11-11 12:09 ` Jiong Wang [this message]
2015-11-11 12:21 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56432FED.7030406@foss.arm.com \
    --to=jiong.wang@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@foss.arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).