* C++ PATCH to checking of explicit instantiation namespace
@ 2015-11-12 20:37 Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2015-11-12 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]
In the testcase, the using-declaration was confusing namespace
comparison into thinking that we were instantiating a template from an
enclosing namespace. Given using-declarations, we need to wait until
we've chosen a template before donig this comparison.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
[-- Attachment #2: inst-ns.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1641 bytes --]
commit 43aa655785ca8da40d07e1320f532950fc9a83b5
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Nov 12 11:22:04 2015 -0500
* pt.c (check_explicit_specialization): Check the namespace after
we choose a template.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 62659ec..2e3d48b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -2800,14 +2800,6 @@ check_explicit_specialization (tree declarator,
error ("%qD is not a template function", dname);
fns = error_mark_node;
}
- else
- {
- tree fn = OVL_CURRENT (fns);
- if (!is_associated_namespace (CP_DECL_CONTEXT (decl),
- CP_DECL_CONTEXT (fn)))
- error ("%qD is not declared in %qD",
- decl, current_namespace);
- }
}
declarator = lookup_template_function (fns, NULL_TREE);
@@ -2941,6 +2933,14 @@ check_explicit_specialization (tree declarator,
return error_mark_node;
else
{
+ if (!ctype && !was_template_id
+ && (specialization || member_specialization
+ || explicit_instantiation)
+ && !is_associated_namespace (CP_DECL_CONTEXT (decl),
+ CP_DECL_CONTEXT (tmpl)))
+ error ("%qD is not declared in %qD",
+ tmpl, current_namespace);
+
tree gen_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
if (explicit_instantiation)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/explicit-instantiation4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/explicit-instantiation4.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..72417b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/explicit-instantiation4.C
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+void f();
+
+namespace A {
+ template <class T> void f(T) { }
+ using ::f;
+ template void f(int);
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-11-12 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-12 20:37 C++ PATCH to checking of explicit instantiation namespace Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).