From: Evandro Menezes <e.menezes@samsung.com>
To: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,
Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Replace insn to zero up DF register
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564E46A5.5010604@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFqB+Pwu_s+metkuMdXx84EVFXfXo3eSr-YSPRpk-81MsXuZnQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/30/2015 05:24 AM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 20 October 2015 at 00:40, Evandro Menezes <e.menezes@samsung.com> wrote:
>> In the existing targets, it seems that it's always faster to zero up a DF
>> register with "movi %d0, #0" instead of "fmov %d0, xzr".
>>
>> This patch modifies the respective pattern.
>
> Hi Evandro,
>
> This patch changes the generic, u architecture independent instruction
> selection. The ARM ARM (C3.5.3) makes a specific recommendation about
> the choice of instruction in this situation and the current
> implementation in GCC follows that recommendation. Wilco has also
> picked up on this issue he has the same patch internal to ARM along
> with an ongoing discussion with ARM architecture folk regarding this
> recommendation. I'm reluctant to take this patch right now on the
> basis that it runs contrary to ARM ARM recommendation pending the
> conclusion of Wilco's discussion with ARM architecture folk.
Ping.
--
Evandro Menezes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 23:41 Evandro Menezes
2015-10-19 23:52 ` Andrew Pinski
2015-10-20 0:33 ` Andrew Pinski
2015-10-20 14:46 ` Andrew Pinski
2015-10-28 18:49 ` Evandro Menezes
2015-10-30 10:26 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2015-11-09 22:59 ` Evandro Menezes
2015-12-03 21:01 ` Evandro Menezes
2015-11-19 22:01 ` Evandro Menezes [this message]
2015-12-16 21:30 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-01-13 0:06 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-01-22 13:52 Wilco Dijkstra
2016-01-27 23:14 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-02-26 12:37 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2016-02-26 22:43 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-02-29 18:07 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2016-02-29 23:11 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-03-01 19:02 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2016-03-01 19:08 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-03-09 21:36 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-03-10 13:23 ` James Greenhalgh
2016-03-10 16:27 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-03-10 16:32 ` Evandro Menezes
2016-03-10 16:37 ` James Greenhalgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564E46A5.5010604@samsung.com \
--to=e.menezes@samsung.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).