From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D2F3857BAA for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:18:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B8D2F3857BAA Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2742gIGs000626; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:17:58 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3hr5j7rtnq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:17:58 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27435NQ6027030; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:17:58 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3hr5j7rtmy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:17:57 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 27435qCL006689; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:17:55 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3hmuwhwmhy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:17:55 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2743HqeI27263266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:17:52 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0E5A405B; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:17:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B195AA4054; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:17:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.197.249.181] (unknown [9.197.249.181]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:17:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <56510994-541d-e6c7-0b26-6e72e4f030c0@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 11:17:48 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] TARGET_MADDLD should include TARGET_POWERPC64 Content-Language: en-US To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: gcc-patches , David , "Kewen.Lin" , Peter Bergner References: <20220803165438.GK25951@gate.crashing.org> From: HAO CHEN GUI In-Reply-To: <20220803165438.GK25951@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 3y8Q65bZdAs8DT1kYWmNzDIYpwJ6ZUkI X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Qi2D8ijkg8bGVZCvNhGDke8eFebHj774 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-03_07,2022-08-02_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=866 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2206140000 definitions=main-2208040013 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:18:01 -0000 Hi Segher, On 4/8/2022 上午 12:54, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hrm. But the maddld insn is useful for SImode as well, in 32-bit mode, > it is just its name that is a bit confusing then. Sorry for confusing > things :-( > > Add a test for SImode maddld as well? Thanks for your comments. Just want to double confirm that a maddld test case with "-m32" and "-mpowerpc64" is needed. As far as I understand, maddld is a 64-bit instruction and it should be used with "-mpowerpc64" in a 32-bit register environment. Thanks again Gui Haochen