Re: [PATCH 1/2] Libsanitizer merge from upstream r253555.

[Maxim Ostapenko <m.ostapenko@partner.samsung.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2241 bytes --]

On 23/11/15 16:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:21:34PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
>> Yeah, right. I've asked about kernel headers just to make sure I correctly
>> understand the issue.
>>
>> Actually, I see such code in
>> lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc:
>>
>> #if defined(PTRACE_GETVFPREGS) && defined(PTRACE_SETVFPREGS)
>>    int ptrace_getvfpregs = PTRACE_GETVFPREGS;
>>    int ptrace_setvfpregs = PTRACE_SETVFPREGS;
>> #else
>>    int ptrace_getvfpregs = -1;
>>    int ptrace_setvfpregs = -1;
>> #endif
>>
>> and in ptrace interceptor:
>>
>>   else if (request == ptrace_setvfpregs)
>>      COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_READ_RANGE(ctx, data, struct_user_vfpregs_struct_sz);
>>   else if (request == ptrace_getvfpregs)
>>      COMMON_INTERCEPTOR_WRITE_RANGE(ctx, data, struct_user_vfpregs_struct_sz)
>>
>> So, perhaps we can do the same thing with ARM_VFPREGS_SIZE, something like
>> this?
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc
>> b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc
>> index 9866cc9..20ff224 100644
>> --- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc
>> +++ b/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc
>> @@ -323,10 +323,14 @@ unsigned struct_ElfW_Phdr_sz = sizeof(Elf_Phdr);
>>     unsigned struct_user_fpxregs_struct_sz = sizeof(struct
>> user_fpxregs_struct);
>>   #endif // __x86_64 || __mips64 || __powerpc64__ || __aarch64__ || __arm__
>>   #ifdef __arm__
>> +#if defined(ARM_VFPREGS_SIZE)
>>     unsigned struct_user_vfpregs_struct_sz = ARM_VFPREGS_SIZE;
>>   #else
>>     unsigned struct_user_vfpregs_struct_sz = 0;
>>   #endif
>> +#else
>> +  unsigned struct_user_vfpregs_struct_sz = 0;
>> +#endif
> Maybe, but then it would need to be approved upstream.
> If you just define ARM_VFPREGS_SIZE to 0 or whatever else in
> the GCC owned wrapper headers, you can avoid that.
> I guess talk to upstream.
>
> 	Jakub
>


Ok, I posted a fix to upstream (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14921) 
yesterday, but it's still not reviewed. So, I'm wondering if I should 
fix the issue locally?
Attaching proposed fix following Jakub's suggestion.

Christophe could you try the patch?

[-- Attachment #2: old-kernels-local-1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 899 bytes --]

diff --git a/libsanitizer/ChangeLog b/libsanitizer/ChangeLog
index b97fc7d..c392c57 100644
--- a/libsanitizer/ChangeLog
+++ b/libsanitizer/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-11-24  Maxim Ostapenko  <m.ostapenko@partner.samsung.com>
+
+	* include/system/linux/asm/ptrace.h: New header.
+
 2015-11-23  Maxim Ostapenko  <m.ostapenko@partner.samsung.com>
 
 	* All source files: Merge from upstream r253555.
diff --git a/libsanitizer/include/system/linux/asm/ptrace.h b/libsanitizer/include/system/linux/asm/ptrace.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dbdd58b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libsanitizer/include/system/linux/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#include_next <linux/asm/ptrace.h>
+#if defined(__arm__)
+#ifndef ARM_VFPREGS_SIZE
+/* The size of the user-visible VFP state as seen by PTRACE_GET/SETVFPREGS
+   and core dumps.  */
+#define ARM_VFPREGS_SIZE ( 32 * 8 /*fpregs*/ + 4 /*fpscr*/ )
+#endif
+#endif