On 11/24/15 00:01, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 01:54 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> On 11/23/15 15:41, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In the 'put' function, why not just make all targets go through
>>> putchar?  It's not like this is performance critical code and I
>>> don't think it compromises any of the tests, does it?
>>
>> I contemplated that, but wondered if someone would complain.  I'm
>> happy either way.
> Let's go with a single codepath here.  The one that ought to work for all
> targets is putchar.

Done.

nathan