From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126297 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 21:04:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126288 invoked by uid 89); 26 Nov 2015 21:04:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:04:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3024C0D2245; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-7-218.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.218]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAQL419f013163; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:04:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leaks in tree-ssa-uninit.c To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <564081EF.7030003@suse.cz> <5645DCB1.6070309@suse.cz> <564610B4.9080708@redhat.com> <564616BD.6070206@suse.cz> <564637C9.4000009@redhat.com> <564C89D9.7090303@suse.cz> <564DA193.9030509@suse.cz> <564DD57E.1080204@redhat.com> <564DE359.9080701@suse.cz> <564E821D.9080303@redhat.com> <564F00D4.8020804@suse.cz> <56577149.4050704@suse.cz> Cc: Jeff Law From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <565773C0.5090903@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56577149.4050704@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03300.txt.bz2 On 11/26/2015 09:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > Is the patch still candidate to be merged in current stage3, or should I > leave it to the next stage1? > What about the first patch or the patch, where I just applied > replacement of whitespaces? As I said previously, the one to just replace whitespace is ok for now. Please ping the other one when stage1 opens (I expect it'll need changes by then). Bernd