From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 73670 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2015 07:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 73652 invoked by uid 89); 2 Dec 2015 07:14:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 07:14:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A41C0CC635; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 07:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-91.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.91]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tB27EMT7029478; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 02:14:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169) To: Jan Sommer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <3667951.xxJfb3I2z2@kubuntu> <4179765.TvvTxxOOIv@kubuntu> <565CD982.1020805@redhat.com> <3224199.SZl8o2VGj7@kubuntu> Cc: devel@rtems.org, sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de, joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <565E9A4E.6070101@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 07:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3224199.SZl8o2VGj7@kubuntu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 On 12/01/2015 12:56 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: > Am Monday 30 November 2015, 16:19:30 schrieb Jeff Law: >> On 11/30/2015 03:06 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: >>> Could someone with write access please commit the patch? >>> The paperwork with the FSF has gone through. If something else is missing, please tell me. >>> I won't be available next week. >> I'm not sure what you built your patches again, but I can't apply them >> to the trunk. Can you resend a patch as a diff against the trunk. >> >> Often I can fix things by hand, but this is Ada and I'd be much more >> likely to botch something. > > I updated the patches again. They should now fit with the heads of the respective branches again. > Maybe the Changelog will be out of synch again. > The patches are for the following branches: > ada-68169_4.9.diff --> gcc-4_9-branch > ada-68169_5.x.diff --> gcc-5-branch > ada-68169_trunk.diff --> trunk > > Let me know if they apply this time. I used svn diff to create them and used patch -p0 to test if they apply locally. THanks. I've committed this to the trunk based on Joel's comments. The gcc-5 branch is frozen for the upcoming release and gcc-4.9 is regression/doc fixes only. It'll be up to the release managers whether or not to backport to those branches. Thanks. Jeff