public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [RFA][PATCH] Run CFG cleanups after reassociation as needed
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 17:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <566081F3.2040702@redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 793 bytes --]

This is something I noticed while working on fixing 67816.

Essentially I was seeing trivially true or trivially false conditionals 
left in the IL for DOM to clean up.

While DOM can and will clean that crud up, but a trivially true or 
trivially false conditional ought to be detected and cleaned up by 
cleanup_cfg.

It turns out the reassociation pass does not schedule a CFG cleanup even 
in cases where it optimizes a conditional to TRUE or FALSE.

Bubbling up an indicator that we optimized away a conditional and using 
that to trigger a CFG cleanup is trivial.

While I have a slight preference to see this fix in GCC 6, if folks 
object and want this to wait for GCC 7 stage1, I'd understand.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.

OK for the trunk?

Thanks,
Jeff

[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8497 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 04dbcb0..61a5e54 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2015-12-03  Jeff Law  <law@redhat.com>
+
+	* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (maybe_optimize_range_tests): Return boolean
+	indicating if a gimple conditional was optimized to true/false.
+	(reassociate_bb): Bubble up return value from
+	maybe_optimize_range_tests.
+	(do_reassoc): Similarly, but for reassociate_bb.
+	(execute_reassoc): Return TODO_cleanup_cfg as needed.
+
 2015-11-27  Jiri Engelthaler  <engycz@gmail.com>
 
 	PR driver/68029
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 4e62a06..893aab1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-12-02  Jeff Law  <law@redhat.com>
+
+	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-43.c: New test.
+
 2015-12-02  Andreas Krebbel  <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 
 	* gcc.dg/optimize-bswapdi-1.c: Force using -mzarch on s390 and
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-43.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-43.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ea44f30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-43.c
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-reassoc -w" } */
+
+typedef union tree_node *tree;
+enum cpp_ttype { CPP_COLON, CPP_SEMICOLON, CPP_CLOSE_BRACE, CPP_COMMA };
+enum rid { RID_STATIC = 0, RID_ATTRIBUTE, };
+typedef struct c_token
+{
+  enum cpp_ttype type:8;
+}
+c_token;
+typedef struct c_parser
+{
+  c_token tokens[2];
+  short tokens_avail;
+}
+c_parser;
+__inline__ c_token *
+c_parser_peek_token (c_parser * parser)
+{
+  if (parser->tokens_avail == 0)
+    {
+      parser->tokens_avail = 1;
+    }
+  return &parser->tokens[0];
+}
+
+__inline__ unsigned char
+c_parser_next_token_is (c_parser * parser, enum cpp_ttype type)
+{
+  return c_parser_peek_token (parser)->type == type;
+}
+
+void
+c_parser_translation_unit (c_parser * parser)
+{
+  tree prefix_attrs;
+  tree all_prefix_attrs;
+  while (1)
+    {
+      if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_COLON)
+	  || c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_COMMA)
+	  || c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_SEMICOLON)
+	  || c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_CLOSE_BRACE)
+	  || c_parser_next_token_is_keyword (parser, RID_ATTRIBUTE))
+	{
+	  if (c_parser_next_token_is_keyword (parser, RID_ATTRIBUTE))
+	    all_prefix_attrs =
+	      chainon (c_parser_attributes (parser), prefix_attrs);
+	}
+    }
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "0 != 0" "reassoc2"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
index dfd0da1..315b0bf 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
@@ -2976,9 +2976,15 @@ struct inter_bb_range_test_entry
   unsigned int first_idx, last_idx;
 };
 
-/* Inter-bb range test optimization.  */
+/* Inter-bb range test optimization.
 
-static void
+   Returns TRUE if a gimple conditional is optimized to a true/false,
+   otherwise return FALSE.
+
+   This indicates to the caller that it should run a CFG cleanup pass
+   once reassociation is completed.  */
+
+static bool
 maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
 {
   basic_block first_bb = gimple_bb (stmt);
@@ -2990,6 +2996,7 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
   auto_vec<operand_entry *> ops;
   auto_vec<inter_bb_range_test_entry> bbinfo;
   bool any_changes = false;
+  bool cfg_cleanup_needed = false;
 
   /* Consider only basic blocks that end with GIMPLE_COND or
      a cast statement satisfying final_range_test_p.  All
@@ -2998,15 +3005,15 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
   if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_COND)
     {
       if (EDGE_COUNT (first_bb->succs) != 2)
-	return;
+	return cfg_cleanup_needed;
     }
   else if (final_range_test_p (stmt))
     other_bb = single_succ (first_bb);
   else
-    return;
+    return cfg_cleanup_needed;
 
   if (stmt_could_throw_p (stmt))
-    return;
+    return cfg_cleanup_needed;
 
   /* As relative ordering of post-dominator sons isn't fixed,
      maybe_optimize_range_tests can be called first on any
@@ -3030,14 +3037,14 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
       /* As non-GIMPLE_COND last stmt always terminates the range,
 	 if forward search didn't discover anything, just give up.  */
       if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_COND)
-	return;
+	return cfg_cleanup_needed;
       /* Look at both successors.  Either it ends with a GIMPLE_COND
 	 and satisfies suitable_cond_bb, or ends with a cast and
 	 other_bb is that cast's successor.  */
       FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, first_bb->succs)
 	if (!(e->flags & (EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE))
 	    || e->dest == first_bb)
-	  return;
+	  return cfg_cleanup_needed;
 	else if (single_pred_p (e->dest))
 	  {
 	    stmt = last_stmt (e->dest);
@@ -3060,7 +3067,7 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
 	      }
 	  }
       if (other_bb == NULL)
-	return;
+	return cfg_cleanup_needed;
     }
   /* Now do the forward search, moving last_bb to successor bbs
      that aren't other_bb.  */
@@ -3080,7 +3087,7 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
       last_bb = e->dest;
     }
   if (first_bb == last_bb)
-    return;
+    return cfg_cleanup_needed;
   /* Here basic blocks first_bb through last_bb's predecessor
      end with GIMPLE_COND, all of them have one of the edges to
      other_bb and another to another block in the range,
@@ -3289,10 +3296,18 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
 	      && ops[bbinfo[idx].first_idx]->op != NULL_TREE)
 	    {
 	      gcond *cond_stmt = as_a <gcond *> (last_stmt (bb));
+	      /* If we collapse the conditional to a true/false
+		 condition, then bubble that knowledge up to our caller.  */
 	      if (integer_zerop (ops[bbinfo[idx].first_idx]->op))
-		gimple_cond_make_false (cond_stmt);
+		{
+		  gimple_cond_make_false (cond_stmt);
+		  cfg_cleanup_needed = true;
+		}
 	      else if (integer_onep (ops[bbinfo[idx].first_idx]->op))
-		gimple_cond_make_true (cond_stmt);
+		{
+		  gimple_cond_make_true (cond_stmt);
+		  cfg_cleanup_needed = true;
+		}
 	      else
 		{
 		  gimple_cond_set_code (cond_stmt, NE_EXPR);
@@ -3306,6 +3321,7 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt)
 	    break;
 	}
     }
+  return cfg_cleanup_needed;
 }
 
 /* Return true if OPERAND is defined by a PHI node which uses the LHS
@@ -4753,17 +4769,20 @@ transform_stmt_to_multiply (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, gimple *stmt,
 }
 
 /* Reassociate expressions in basic block BB and its post-dominator as
-   children.  */
+   children.
 
-static void
+   Bubble up return status from maybe_optimize_range_tests.  */
+
+static bool
 reassociate_bb (basic_block bb)
 {
   gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
   basic_block son;
   gimple *stmt = last_stmt (bb);
+  bool cfg_cleanup_needed = false;
 
   if (stmt && !gimple_visited_p (stmt))
-    maybe_optimize_range_tests (stmt);
+    cfg_cleanup_needed |= maybe_optimize_range_tests (stmt);
 
   for (gsi = gsi_last_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_prev (&gsi))
     {
@@ -4922,7 +4941,9 @@ reassociate_bb (basic_block bb)
   for (son = first_dom_son (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, bb);
        son;
        son = next_dom_son (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, son))
-    reassociate_bb (son);
+    cfg_cleanup_needed |= reassociate_bb (son);
+
+  return cfg_cleanup_needed;
 }
 
 /* Add jumps around shifts for range tests turned into bit tests.
@@ -5028,11 +5049,13 @@ debug_ops_vector (vec<operand_entry *> ops)
   dump_ops_vector (stderr, ops);
 }
 
-static void
+/* Bubble up return status from reassociate_bb.  */
+
+static bool
 do_reassoc (void)
 {
   break_up_subtract_bb (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
-  reassociate_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
+  return reassociate_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
 }
 
 /* Initialize the reassociation pass.  */
@@ -5106,7 +5129,10 @@ fini_reassoc (void)
 }
 
 /* Gate and execute functions for Reassociation.  If INSERT_POWI_P, enable
-   insertion of __builtin_powi calls.  */
+   insertion of __builtin_powi calls.
+
+   Returns TODO_cfg_cleanup if a CFG cleanup pass is desired due to
+   optimization of a gimple conditional.  Otherwise returns zero.  */
 
 static unsigned int
 execute_reassoc (bool insert_powi_p)
@@ -5115,12 +5141,13 @@ execute_reassoc (bool insert_powi_p)
 
   init_reassoc ();
 
-  do_reassoc ();
+  bool cfg_cleanup_needed;
+  cfg_cleanup_needed = do_reassoc ();
   repropagate_negates ();
   branch_fixup ();
 
   fini_reassoc ();
-  return 0;
+  return cfg_cleanup_needed ? TODO_cleanup_cfg : 0;
 }
 
 namespace {

             reply	other threads:[~2015-12-03 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03 17:55 Jeff Law [this message]
2015-12-04 10:19 ` Richard Biener
2015-12-04 16:20   ` Jeff Law
2015-12-04 17:21     ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=566081F3.2040702@redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).