From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66919 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2015 17:44:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 66901 invoked by uid 89); 15 Dec 2015 17:44:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:44:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F407F3B759; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-83.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.83]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tBFHhwVg002412; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:43:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [BUILDROBOT] "error: null argument where non-null required" on multiple targets To: Jan-Benedict Glaw , "Moore, Catherine" References: <20151206214848.GA495@lug-owl.de> <20151214200746.GA27807@lug-owl.de> Cc: Denis Chertykov , Eric Christopher , Matthew Fortune , David Edelsohn , Alexandre Oliva , Kaz Kojima , Oleg Endo , Jonathan Wakely , gcc-patches From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <5670515E.7030009@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:44:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151214200746.GA27807@lug-owl.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg01510.txt.bz2 On 12/14/2015 01:07 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Mon, 2015-12-14 18:54:28 +0000, Moore, Catherine wrote: >>> avr-rtems http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478544 >>> mipsel-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478844 >>> mipsisa64r2-sde-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478855 >>> mipsisa64sb1-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478865 >>> mips-rtems http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478877 >>> powerpc-eabialtivec http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478922 >>> powerpc-eabispe http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478932 >>> powerpc-rtems http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478956 >>> ppc-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478968 >>> sh-superh-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=479077 >> >> Is there an easy way to reproduce the MIPS problems that you >> reported? I don't seem to be able to do it with a cross-compiler >> targeting mipsel-elf. > > What's your build compiler? For these builds, where it showed up, I'm > using a freshly compiles HEAD/master version. So basically, compile a > current GCC for your build machine: Right. This is something that only shows up when using the trunk to build the crosses. When I looked, I thought I bisected it to the delayed folding work. jeff