From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127840 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2015 18:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127758 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2015 18:05:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=UD:php X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:05:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2042832D3D9; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-83.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.83]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tBHI5gtT029600; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:05:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [BUILDROBOT] "error: null argument where non-null required" on multiple targets To: Jan-Benedict Glaw References: <20151206214848.GA495@lug-owl.de> <20151214200746.GA27807@lug-owl.de> <5670515E.7030009@redhat.com> <20151216104603.GB27807@lug-owl.de> Cc: "Moore, Catherine" , Denis Chertykov , Eric Christopher , Matthew Fortune , David Edelsohn , Alexandre Oliva , Kaz Kojima , Oleg Endo , Jonathan Wakely , gcc-patches From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <5672F976.1090609@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151216104603.GB27807@lug-owl.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg01805.txt.bz2 On 12/16/2015 03:46 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-15 10:43:58 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 12/14/2015 01:07 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-12-14 18:54:28 +0000, Moore, Catherine wrote: >>>>> avr-rtems http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478544 >>>>> mipsel-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478844 >>>>> mipsisa64r2-sde-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478855 >>>>> mipsisa64sb1-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478865 >>>>> mips-rtems http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478877 >>>>> powerpc-eabialtivec http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478922 >>>>> powerpc-eabispe http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478932 >>>>> powerpc-rtems http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478956 >>>>> ppc-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478968 >>>>> sh-superh-elf http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=479077 >>>> >>>> Is there an easy way to reproduce the MIPS problems that you >>>> reported? I don't seem to be able to do it with a cross-compiler >>>> targeting mipsel-elf. >>> >>> What's your build compiler? For these builds, where it showed up, I'm >>> using a freshly compiles HEAD/master version. So basically, compile a >>> current GCC for your build machine: >> Right. This is something that only shows up when using the trunk to build >> the crosses. >> >> When I looked, I thought I bisected it to the delayed folding work. > > Shall I bisect one of the cases anew, with the "Test value of > _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_WCHAR not whether it is defined" patch that uncovered > it, applied? Starting with some arbitrary old revision? Yes. I'd really like to see config-list.mk working again. The first step is always building a test the developers can easily work with. jeff