From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101414 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2016 07:36:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101387 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2016 07:36:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=6th, 5th, pedantic, month X-HELO: julia1.inet.fi Received: from mta-out1.inet.fi (HELO julia1.inet.fi) (62.71.2.231) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 07:36:51 +0000 Received: from ap.localhost.localdomain (84.250.123.11) by julia1.inet.fi (9.0.002.03-2-gbe5d057) (authenticated as pavean-2) id 566976B500E8BC46; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:33:12 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] [DJGPP] configure.ac: enable LTO To: Jeff Law , DJ Delorie , GCC Patches References: <56631E04.5060609@wippies.com> <5669FD71.9020309@redhat.com> <566C4DE0.2080307@wippies.com> <566DA471.5060005@redhat.com> <201512131812.tBDICrIp006806@greed.delorie.com> <56739EF4.2040800@wippies.com> <56785A71.3040306@redhat.com> <5678EC40.2040404@iki.fi> <56904664.70508@redhat.com> From: Andris Pavenis Message-ID: <5690B88F.2010800@iki.fi> Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 07:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56904664.70508@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 On 01/09/2016 01:29 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/21/2015 11:22 PM, Andris Pavenis wrote: >> 12/21/2015, 10:00 PM, Jeff Law kirjoitti: >>> On 12/17/2015 10:51 PM, Andris Pavenis wrote: >>>> On 12/13/2015 08:12 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >>>>>> You can list me as your sponsor. >>>>> I've been wanting him to be a djgpp target/host maintainer for >>>>> years anyway, so +1 from me :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Approved part of patches are in (except 6th which I commit after >>>> 5th) >>>> >>>> In middle come a problem with mailing list (collected outgoing >>>> patches in a batch and did not notice that I had written wrong >>>> address). Noticed it only after sending when it was too late. >>> Is there anything in this series that still needs review? >>> >> >> Well. I understood that new version of patch could require new >> approving. I comments about 5th patch which I took into account in new >> patch version or responded. There were however no "OK for trunk" or >> equivalent. Sorry if I'm too pedantic > No worries. We're always happy when folks are conservative, particularly when they're just > getting engaged with the community. > > Can you post the updated #5 patch. DJ or I will give it a final yes/no so that you can move > forward. It was actually already sent a month ago with comments corresponding review notices:: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01328.html Andris