From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 118351 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2016 21:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 118341 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2016 21:45:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:45:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9903A350102; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.37] (ovpn-116-37.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.37]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0BLjJGY022267; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:45:20 -0500 Subject: Re: C++ patch ping To: Nathan Sidwell , Jakub Jelinek References: <20160109074122.GP18720@tucnak.redhat.com> <56940A23.4040501@acm.org> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Jason Merrill Message-ID: <5694224E.9090707@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56940A23.4040501@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00651.txt.bz2 On 01/11/2016 03:01 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 01/09/16 02:41, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'd like to ping the PR c++/66808, PR c++/69000 >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02019.html >> patch, fixing ICE with GNU __thread vars in templates. > > Can't you unconditionally clear DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO regardless of local_p? > > if (DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC(r)) > DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO(r) == NULL_TREE; > ? Or clear it for local_p down by where we're setting it for !local_p. Jason