public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [doc, 4/n] invoke.texi: there is no part 4
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569852D1.100@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5692EE28.1070502@codesourcery.com>

Part 4 of this series was originally intended to move the section "Using 
Precompiled Headers" from invoke.texi to extend.texi.  But, as I started 
to dig around to decide exactly where its should go, I didn't see a good 
place to put it there, either -- extend.texi is still very disorganized. 
  I've decided to leave the section where it is for now.

In the long run, I think maybe it should be grouped with other 
documentation describing preprocessor extensions, since it is 
essentially describing an extension to #include.

-Sandra

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-15  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-10 23:50 [doc, 0/n] improve organization of invoke.texi Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-12 17:45 ` [doc, 1/n] invoke.texi: name of gcc executable Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-13  0:48 ` [doc, 1.5/n] invoke.texi: reclassify -no-canonical-prefixes and -specs= Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-13  3:31 ` [doc, 2/n] invoke.texi: move spec file section Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-13 21:08 ` [doc, 3/n] invoke.texi: move "Code Gen Options" before target-specific options Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-25  0:16   ` Gerald Pfeifer
2016-01-13 23:38 ` [doc, 3.5/n] invoke.texi: rename "Machine-Dependent Options" section Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-15  2:00 ` Sandra Loosemore [this message]
2016-01-15  2:18 ` [doc, 5/n] invoke.texi: add new "Program Instrumentation " Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-15  8:39   ` Mikhail Maltsev
2016-01-15 15:52     ` Sandra Loosemore
2016-01-17  4:12 ` [doc, 6/n] invoke.texi: split debugging options into programmer vs developer sections Sandra Loosemore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569852D1.100@codesourcery.com \
    --to=sandra@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).