public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mickael guene <mickael.guene@st.com>
To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>,
	       "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PING] Add new mexecute-only arm option.
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B1C6E9.9070308@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B10A41.6010503@codesourcery.com>

Hi Sandra,

  Thanks for your feedback.

On 02/02/2016 08:57 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
 > On 02/02/2016 02:06 AM, mickael guene wrote:
 >> Hi All,
 >>
 >>    Ping for following thread :
 >>
 >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01968.html
 >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01969.html
 >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01970.html
 >
 > Two comments:
 >
 > (1) MIPS has had a similar option for quite some time called
 > -mcode-readable=.  It might be less confusing to use a similar name for
 > the ARM option with the similar reversed sense to -mexecute-only, even
 > if it doesn't need to be a tristate flag like for MIPS.
  I was unaware of this MIPS option. But anyway I would rather prefer to
stick with -mexecute-only since it's very similar to armcc option naming
for the same feature (--execute_only).

 > (2) I suggest changing the help string for the command line option
 >
 >> +
 >> +mexecute-only
 >> +Target Report Var(target_execute_only) Init(0)
 >> +Forbid load into text sections.
 >
 > to use the same wording as the documentation in the manual:
 >
 >> +@item -mexecute-only
 >> +@opindex mexecute-only
 >> +Disable read memory access inside code sections.  Only code fetching is
 >> +allowed.
 >> +This option is off by default.
 >> +
 >
 > Or at least, "load into text sections" is confusing.  (You load *from*
 > the text section, not *into* it, right?)

  You're right. I will reuse documentation sentence.

Regards
Mickael

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-03  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-02  9:06 mickael guene
2016-02-02 19:58 ` Sandra Loosemore
2016-02-03  9:23   ` mickael guene [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B1C6E9.9070308@st.com \
    --to=mickael.guene@st.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).