From: Joern Wolfgang Rennecke <gnu@amylaar.uk>
To: Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Francois.Bedard@synopsys.com" <Francois.Bedard@synopsys.com>,
"jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com" <jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARC] Add single/double IEEE precission FPU support.
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 06:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BADB05.4020100@amylaar.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <098ECE41A0A6114BB2A07F1EC238DE8966176790@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
On 09/02/16 15:34, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
> Most of the cases checking only the CC user may be sufficient. However, there are cases (only one which I found), where the CC user has a different mode than of the CC setter. This is happening when running gcc.dg/pr56424.c test. Here, the C_FPU mode cstore is simplified by the following steps losing the CC_FPU mode:
>
> In the expand:
> 18: cc:CC_FPU=cmp(r159:DF,r162:DF)
> 19: r163:SI=cc:CC_FPU<0
> 20: r161:QI=r163:SI#0
> 21: r153:SI=zero_extend(r161:QI)
> 22: cc:CC_ZN=cmp(r153:SI,0)
> 23: pc={(cc:CC_ZN!=0)?L28:pc}
>
> Then after combine we get this:
> 18: cc:CC_FPU=cmp(r2:DF,r4:DF)
> REG_DEAD r4:DF
> REG_DEAD r2:DF
> 23: pc={(cc:CC_ZN<0)?L28:pc}
> REG_DEAD cc:CC_ZN
> REG_BR_PROB 6102
That sound like a bug. Have you looked more closely what's going on?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-10 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 13:58 Claudiu Zissulescu
2016-02-02 22:52 ` Joern Wolfgang Rennecke
2016-02-03 15:02 ` Claudiu Zissulescu
2016-02-03 18:42 ` Joern Wolfgang Rennecke
2016-02-05 14:16 ` Joern Wolfgang Rennecke
2016-02-05 15:54 ` Claudiu Zissulescu
2016-02-09 15:34 ` Claudiu Zissulescu
2016-02-10 6:39 ` Joern Wolfgang Rennecke [this message]
2016-02-10 9:45 ` Claudiu Zissulescu
2016-02-10 12:43 ` Claudiu Zissulescu
2016-02-10 13:31 ` Claudiu Zissulescu
2016-02-12 23:42 ` Joern Wolfgang Rennecke
2016-02-16 14:17 ` Claudiu Zissulescu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BADB05.4020100@amylaar.uk \
--to=gnu@amylaar.uk \
--cc=Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com \
--cc=Francois.Bedard@synopsys.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).