From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70689 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2016 16:03:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70661 invoked by uid 89); 11 Feb 2016 16:03:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MANYTO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:565, tbh X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:03:46 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-02x.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206] helo=SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1aTtiW-0000q0-MG from Sandra_Loosemore@mentor.com ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:03:40 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:03:40 -0800 Subject: Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm To: Bernd Schmidt , David Wohlferd , Bernd Edlinger , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Richard Henderson , "jason@redhat.com" References: <56A54EF9.8060006@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56A61442.3090803@redhat.com> <56A9C134.1030500@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56B80F57.9020606@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BBCC90.9020001@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BCAB73.20506@redhat.com> CC: "segher@kernel.crashing.org" , "Paul_Koning@Dell.com" , Jeff Law , "bernds_cb1@t-online.de" , Andrew Haley From: Sandra Loosemore Message-ID: <56BCB0DA.1040806@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56BCAB73.20506@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00772.txt.bz2 On 02/11/2016 08:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > But again, if someone feels the docs patch as posted is preferrable, go > ahead and approve it (for stage1 I assume). TBH, I haven't looked at the documentation patch at all; I've been ignoring this issue because (a) I thought the technical details were still under discussion and (b) adding a new command-line option is stage 1 material not suitable to commit right now anyway. I'll take a look at the docs once the name and behavior of the new option have been settled upon. -Sandra