From: David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com>
To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>,
Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
"jason@redhat.com" <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: "segher@kernel.crashing.org" <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Paul_Koning@Dell.com" <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>,
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,
"bernds_cb1@t-online.de" <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>,
Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
David Wohlferd <dw@LimeGreenSocks.com>
Subject: Re: AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 07:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BD84BB.10504@LimeGreenSocks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56BCB0DA.1040806@codesourcery.com>
On 2/11/2016 8:03 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 08:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>> But again, if someone feels the docs patch as posted is preferrable, go
>> ahead and approve it (for stage1 I assume).
>
> TBH, I haven't looked at the documentation patch at all; I've been
> ignoring this issue because (a) I thought the technical details were
> still under discussion and (b) adding a new command-line option is
> stage 1 material not suitable to commit right now anyway.
>
> I'll take a look at the docs once the name and behavior of the new
> option have been settled upon.
So far, no one has suggested any changes to the behavior. And we seem
to have settled on a name.
dw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-12 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-24 22:24 Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-01-25 12:25 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Schmidt
2016-01-28 7:21 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-02-08 3:46 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-02-08 6:45 ` AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Edlinger
2016-02-08 20:15 ` David Wohlferd
2016-02-10 23:50 ` David Wohlferd
2016-02-11 6:51 ` AW: " Bernd Edlinger
2016-02-12 7:01 ` David Wohlferd
2016-02-11 15:40 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-02-11 16:03 ` Sandra Loosemore
2016-02-12 7:08 ` David Wohlferd [this message]
2016-02-12 7:05 ` David Wohlferd
2016-02-12 12:51 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-02-13 1:03 ` Sandra Loosemore
2016-02-14 4:00 ` David Wohlferd
2016-02-20 1:03 ` David Wohlferd
2016-02-20 12:08 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Edlinger
2016-02-21 10:28 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-02-26 15:10 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Schmidt
2016-02-29 7:02 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-03-11 0:56 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-03-14 15:29 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Schmidt
2016-03-17 5:24 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-03-18 13:32 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Schmidt
2016-03-18 15:01 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Richard Biener
2016-03-18 19:14 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Schmidt
2016-02-14 3:57 ` AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-01-26 0:32 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Segher Boessenkool
2016-01-26 12:11 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Schmidt
2016-01-26 16:12 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Segher Boessenkool
2016-01-26 23:38 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm David Wohlferd
2016-02-16 14:03 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Jan Hubicka
2016-02-16 20:02 ` Wonly-top-basic-asm Bernd Edlinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BD84BB.10504@LimeGreenSocks.com \
--to=dw@limegreensocks.com \
--cc=Paul_Koning@Dell.com \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=bernds_cb1@t-online.de \
--cc=bschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).