From: Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gnu.org>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PING^3][PATCH, 12/16] Handle acc loop directive
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CAE8F6.9000302@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56BDBDC3.6010708@mentor.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2390 bytes --]
On 12/02/16 12:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 26/01/16 13:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> Ping^3. ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01089.html )
>>
>> First of all, I wonder if it wouldn't be far easier to handle these
>> during
>> gimplification rather than during omp expansion or during parsing.
>> Inside
>> kernels, do you need to honor any clauses on the acc loop, like
>> privatization etc., or can you just ignore it altogether (after
>> parsing them
>> to ensure they are valid)?
>
> The oacc loop clauses are: gang, worker, vector, seq, auto, tile,
> device_type, independent, private, reduction.
>
> AFAIU, there're all safe to ignore. That has largely been the approach
> in the gomp-4_0-branch, and sofar I haven't seen any failures due to
> ignoring a loop clause in a kernels region.
>
> But we do want to be able to honor loop clauses in a kernels region at
> some point. F.i., supporting the independent clause would allow more
> test-cases to be parallelized.
>
> At some point we had an implementation of the independent clause in the
> gomp-4_0-branch, but that had to be reverted (
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg00696.html ).
>
> Anyway, the implementation of the propagation of the independent
> property was to keep the loop directive with the independent clause
> until omp-expand (where we have cfg), and set a new field
> marked_independent in the corresponding struct loop.
>
> If we want to do the expansion of the loop directive to a normal loop at
> gimplication, I see two issues:
> - in general, we don't only check for correctness during parsing,
> there's also checking being done during scan_omp, which happens in
> pass_lower_omp, after gimplification.
> - how do we mark the new loop as being independent?
>
>> Handling this in expand_omp_for_generic is not really nice, because it
>> will
>> make already very complicated function even more complex.
>
> An alternative would be to copy expand_omp_for_generic, apply the patch,
> and partially evaluate for the single call introduced in the patch.
>
> Do you prefer this approach?
Jakub,
Following up on your suggestion to implement this during gimplification,
I wrote attached patch.
I'll put it through some openacc testing and add testcases. Is this
approach acceptable for stage4?
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Ignore-acc-loop-directive-in-kernels-region.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3514 bytes --]
Ignore acc loop directive in kernels region
---
gcc/gimplify.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify.c
index 7be6bd7..cec0627 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.c
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -8364,6 +8364,82 @@ find_combined_omp_for (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *)
return NULL_TREE;
}
+/* Gimplify the loops with index I and higher in omp_for FOR_STMT as a
+ sequential loop, and append the resulting gimple statements to PRE_P. */
+
+static void
+gimplify_omp_for_seq (tree for_stmt, gimple_seq *pre_p, unsigned int i)
+{
+ gcc_assert (OMP_FOR_ORIG_DECLS (for_stmt) == NULL_TREE);
+ unsigned int len = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (OMP_FOR_INIT (for_stmt));
+ gcc_assert (i < len);
+
+ /* Gimplify OMP_FOR[i] as:
+
+ if (i == 0)
+ OMP_FOR_PRE_BODY;
+ OMP_FOR_INIT[i];
+ goto <loop_entry_label>;
+ <fall_thru_label>:
+ if (i == len - 1)
+ OMP_FOR_BODY;
+ else
+ OMP_FOR[i+1];
+ OMP_FOR_INCR[i];
+ <loop_entry_label>:
+ if (OMP_FOR_COND[i])
+ goto <fall_thru_label>;
+ else
+ goto <loop_exit_label>;
+ <loop_exit_label>:
+ */
+
+ tree loop_entry_label = create_artificial_label (UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
+ tree fall_thru_label = create_artificial_label (UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
+ tree loop_exit_label = create_artificial_label (UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
+
+ /* if (i = 0) OMP_FOR_PRE_BODY. */
+ if (i == 0)
+ gimplify_and_add (OMP_FOR_PRE_BODY (for_stmt), pre_p);
+
+ /* OMP_FOR_INIT[i]. */
+ tree init = TREE_VEC_ELT (OMP_FOR_INIT (for_stmt), i);
+ gimplify_stmt (&init, pre_p);
+
+ /* goto <loop_entry_label>. */
+ gimplify_seq_add_stmt (pre_p, gimple_build_goto (loop_entry_label));
+
+ /* <fall_thru_label>. */
+ gimplify_seq_add_stmt (pre_p, gimple_build_label (fall_thru_label));
+
+ /* if (i == len - 1) OMP_FOR_BODY
+ else OMP_FOR[i+1]. */
+ if (i == len - 1)
+ gimplify_and_return_first (OMP_FOR_BODY (for_stmt), pre_p);
+ else
+ gimplify_omp_for_seq (for_stmt, pre_p, i + 1);
+
+ /* OMP_FOR_INCR[i]. */
+ tree incr = TREE_VEC_ELT (OMP_FOR_INCR (for_stmt), i);
+ gimplify_stmt (&incr, pre_p);
+
+ /* <loop_entry_label>. */
+ gimplify_seq_add_stmt (pre_p, gimple_build_label (loop_entry_label));
+
+ /* if (OMP_FOR_COND[i]) goto <fall_thru_label>
+ else goto <loop_exit_label>. */
+ tree cond = TREE_VEC_ELT (OMP_FOR_COND (for_stmt), i);
+ tree var = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
+ tree final_val = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1);
+ gimplify_expr (&final_val, pre_p, NULL, is_gimple_val, fb_rvalue);
+ gimple *gimple_cond = gimple_build_cond (TREE_CODE (cond), var, final_val,
+ fall_thru_label, loop_exit_label);
+ gimplify_seq_add_stmt (pre_p, gimple_cond);
+
+ /* <loop_exit_label>. */
+ gimplify_seq_add_stmt (pre_p, gimple_build_label (loop_exit_label));
+}
+
/* Gimplify the gross structure of an OMP_FOR statement. */
static enum gimplify_status
@@ -8403,6 +8479,15 @@ gimplify_omp_for (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p)
gcc_unreachable ();
}
+ if (ort == ORT_ACC
+ && gimplify_omp_ctxp != NULL
+ && gimplify_omp_ctxp->region_type == ORT_ACC_KERNELS)
+ {
+ /* For now, ignore loop directive in kernels region. */
+ gimplify_omp_for_seq (for_stmt, pre_p, 0);
+ return GS_ALL_DONE;
+ }
+
/* Set OMP_CLAUSE_LINEAR_NO_COPYIN flag on explicit linear
clause for the IV. */
if (ort == ORT_SIMD && TREE_VEC_LENGTH (OMP_FOR_INIT (for_stmt)) == 1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 15:35 [PATCH series, 16] Use parloops to parallelize oacc kernels regions Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 15:44 ` [PATCH, 1/16] Insert new exit block only when needed in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 10:50 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-09 15:45 ` [PATCH, 2/16] Make create_parallel_loop return void Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 10:50 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-09 15:51 ` [PATCH, 3/16] Ignore reduction clause on kernels directive Tom de Vries
2015-11-24 12:25 ` [PING][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 14:24 ` [PING^2][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 14:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-11-09 16:10 ` [PATCH, 4/16] Implement -foffload-alias Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 10:53 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-11 11:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-11-12 16:04 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-13 8:46 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-13 11:03 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-13 11:30 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-13 11:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-11-21 12:24 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-23 11:46 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-27 11:44 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-27 12:14 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-02 9:59 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-03-14 13:16 ` Tom de Vries
2016-03-14 23:18 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-02 9:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-12-02 13:11 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-11 12:45 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-11 13:00 ` Richard Biener
2015-12-13 16:38 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-14 13:26 ` Richard Biener
2015-12-14 15:44 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-16 13:16 ` Richard Biener
2015-12-16 14:43 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-17 12:03 ` [gomp4] " Thomas Schwinge
2015-12-03 11:53 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 16:31 ` [PATCH, 5/16] Add in_oacc_kernels_region in struct loop Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 10:57 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-16 11:39 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-16 11:39 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-16 12:41 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-09 17:39 ` [PATCH, 6/16] Add pass_oacc_kernels Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 10:59 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-19 13:51 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-24 12:17 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-25 10:42 ` Richard Biener
2016-02-05 12:06 ` Use plain -fopenacc to enable OpenACC kernels processing (was: [PATCH, 6/16] Add pass_oacc_kernels) Thomas Schwinge
2016-02-10 14:40 ` Use plain -fopenacc to enable OpenACC kernels processing Thomas Schwinge
2016-02-15 16:54 ` Tom de Vries
2016-02-23 15:19 ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-11-09 18:14 ` [PATCH, 7/16] Add pass_dominator_oacc_kernels Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 11:05 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-16 12:04 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 18:34 ` [PATCH, 8/16] Add pass_ch_oacc_kernels Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 20:29 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-30 12:12 ` [gomp4] Use pass_ch instead of pass_ch_oacc_kernels (was: [PATCH, 8/16] Add pass_ch_oacc_kernels) Thomas Schwinge
2015-11-09 19:53 ` [PATCH, 9/16] Add pass_parallelize_loops_oacc_kernels Tom de Vries
2015-11-16 11:59 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-24 12:27 ` Tom de Vries
2015-12-13 16:58 ` [PIING][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2015-12-14 15:23 ` Richard Biener
2016-01-16 22:41 ` [Committed] Move pass_expand_omp_ssa out of pass_parallelize_loops Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 12:59 ` [Committed] Allow pass_parallelize_loops to be run outside the loop pipeline Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 13:07 ` [committed] Add oacc_kernels_p argument to pass_parallelize_loops Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 13:30 ` [committed] Add pass_parallelize_loops to pass_oacc_kernels Tom de Vries
2016-01-20 8:54 ` [committed] Add oacc_kernels_p argument to pass_parallelize_loops Thomas Schwinge
2016-01-20 10:31 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 19:59 ` [PATCH, 10/16] Add pass_oacc_kernels pass group in passes.def Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 11:03 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-16 11:55 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-16 12:45 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-16 23:21 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-17 10:05 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-17 14:54 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-17 15:18 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-17 15:39 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-17 22:21 ` [PATCH, PR68373 ] Call scev_const_prop in pass_parallelize_loops::execute Tom de Vries
2015-11-19 9:36 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-20 10:15 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-18 8:30 ` [PATCH, 10/16] Add pass_oacc_kernels pass group in passes.def Richard Biener
2015-11-18 16:22 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-11-20 12:53 ` [committed, trivial] Fix typo and trailing whitespace in dump-file strings in parloops Tom de Vries
2015-11-19 0:35 ` [PATCH, 10/16] Add pass_oacc_kernels pass group in passes.def Tom de Vries
2015-11-20 10:28 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-21 8:42 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-23 11:31 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-23 15:53 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-23 16:38 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-19 10:31 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-20 10:37 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-20 13:27 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-20 13:29 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-20 16:34 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-23 10:11 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-24 12:22 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-24 13:19 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-24 14:33 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-24 14:36 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-24 15:05 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-25 10:43 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-25 10:44 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-30 17:48 ` [gomp4] " Thomas Schwinge
2015-11-22 23:37 ` [PATCH] Don't reapply loops flags if unnecessary in loop_optimizer_init Tom de Vries
2015-11-23 10:33 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-23 11:27 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 20:02 ` [PATCH, 11/16] Update testcases after adding kernels pass group Tom de Vries
2015-11-11 11:03 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-12 14:32 ` Tom de Vries
2015-11-12 14:43 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-12 15:42 ` David Malcolm
2015-11-13 9:44 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-09 20:06 ` [PATCH, 12/16] Handle acc loop directive Tom de Vries
2015-11-24 12:30 ` [PING][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 14:27 ` [PING^2][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2016-01-26 12:38 ` [PING^3][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2016-01-26 12:50 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-02-12 11:11 ` Tom de Vries
2016-02-22 10:55 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2016-02-22 10:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-02-29 3:27 ` Tom de Vries
2016-03-07 8:22 ` [PING][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2016-03-14 6:21 ` [PING^2][PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 20:08 ` [PATCH, 13/16] Add c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-*.c Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 13:33 ` [committed] Add oacc kernels tests in goacc Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 20:09 ` [PATCH, 14/16] Add gfortran.dg/goacc/kernels-*.f95 Tom de Vries
2015-11-09 20:11 ` [PATCH, 15/16] Add libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-*.c Tom de Vries
2016-01-18 13:39 ` [comitted] Add oacc kernels test in libgomp Tom de Vries
2016-03-09 9:18 ` [PATCH, 15/16] Add libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-*.c Tom de Vries
2016-03-18 12:46 ` Scan for parallelization of the oacc kernels test-cases in gfortran.dg/goacc (was: [PATCH, 15/16] Add libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-*.c) Thomas Schwinge
2016-04-05 9:13 ` Scan for parallelization of the oacc kernels test-cases in gfortran.dg/goacc Tom de Vries
2016-04-07 15:26 ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-11-09 20:12 ` [PATCH, 16/16] Add libgomp.oacc-fortran/kernels-*.f95 Tom de Vries
2016-03-09 9:19 ` Tom de Vries
2016-03-16 13:12 ` Thomas Schwinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CAE8F6.9000302@mentor.com \
--to=tom_devries@mentor.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).