From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101881 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2016 15:10:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101850 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2016 15:10:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_MANYTO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=likes, HTo:U*sandra X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:09:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F22CC0ED2E1; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-7-204.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.204]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1QF9r26013737; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:09:54 -0500 Subject: Re: Wonly-top-basic-asm To: David Wohlferd , Bernd Edlinger , Sandra Loosemore , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Richard Henderson , "jason@redhat.com" References: <56A54EF9.8060006@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56A61442.3090803@redhat.com> <56A9C134.1030500@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56B80F57.9020606@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BBCC90.9020001@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BCAB73.20506@redhat.com> <56BD8427.4050405@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BDD550.3050908@redhat.com> <56BE80F4.6060803@codesourcery.com> <56BFFBD9.7010202@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56C7BB50.4000909@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56C99113.7090602@LimeGreenSocks.com> Cc: "segher@kernel.crashing.org" , "Paul_Koning@Dell.com" , Jeff Law , Andrew Haley , "hubicka@ucw.cz" From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <56D06AC1.7090607@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C99113.7090602@LimeGreenSocks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg01802.txt.bz2 On 02/21/2016 11:27 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: > So now what? I have one Bernd who likes the sample, and one who > doesn't. Obviously I think what I'm proposing is better than what's > there now and I've done my best to say why. But me believing it to be > better doesn't get anything checked in. I hadn't thought it through well enough. Jan's objection (order isn't guaranteed) is relevant. I'd drop the example. Bernd