From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 88662 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2016 13:37:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 88648 invoked by uid 89); 29 Feb 2016 13:37:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=krebbel, Krebbel, define_subst, renumbering X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:37:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCA280516; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-7-37.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.37]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1TDawck020505; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 08:36:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] gensupport: Fix define_subst operand renumbering. To: Andreas Krebbel , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <1456735599-21355-1-git-send-email-krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1456735599-21355-2-git-send-email-krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.com From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <56D4497A.40304@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1456735599-21355-2-git-send-email-krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg01941.txt.bz2 On 02/29/2016 09:46 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > Ok for mainline? > > * gensupport.c (process_substs_on_one_elem): Split loop to > complete mark_operands_used_in_match_dup on all expressions in the > vector first. > (adjust_operands_numbers): Inline into process_substs_on_one_elem > and remove function. Didn't I approve this a while ago? Not sure it's appropriate for stage4 though; is this series fixing an important regression? Bernd