From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR69195, Reload confused by invalid reg equivs
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 17:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E44CBD.6010806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2EBC7A3F-3136-4284-9155-D5C0A7875320@gmail.com>
On 03/12/2016 04:10 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On March 12, 2016 10:29:40 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:37:25PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>>>> I believe Alan's point is DSE deleted the assignment to x which
>> can't be
>>>> right as long as we've left in goto *&x.
>>>>
>>>> The goto *&x should be a use of x and thus should have kept the
>> assignment
>>>> live.
>>>
>>> Right, I wasn't trying to say that ira.c:indirect_jump_optimize is
>>> OK. It needs the patch I posted or perhaps even better a test of
>>> DF_REF_INSN_INFO rather than !DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (simply because
>> the
>>> flag test is reading another field, and we need to read
>>> DF_REF_INSN_INFO anyway).
>>
>> Ok, that was my point. BTW, DSE isn't the only one that deletes x = 0;
>> cddce deletes it too. -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce preserves it till
>> expansion.
>
> GIMPLE_GOTO doesn't have VOPs and I don't think that we'd want VUSEs on all gotos. But just having them on indirect gotos would be inconsistent.
>
> I believe the code is undefined anyway and out of scope of a reasonable QOI.
Undefined? Most likely. But we still have to do something sensible.
As Jakub noted, a user could create the problematic code just as easily
as DCE/DSE, so IRA probably needs to be tolerant of this situation.
So it seems like you're suggesting we leave DCE/DSE alone (declaring
this usage undefined) and fix IRA to be tolerant, right?
> Using alloca to create/jump to code on the stack should work (we might transform that into a decl though).
Given that executable stacks are a huge security hole, I'd be willing to
go out on a limb and declare that undefined as well. It's not as clear
cut, but that's the argument I'd make.
And yes, I realize that goes in opposition to what GCC has allowed for
20+ years. I still think it'd be the right thing to do.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-12 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-04 14:54 [RFC] " Alan Modra
2016-03-04 17:40 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-03-07 14:47 ` Alan Modra
2016-03-10 9:18 ` [PATCH] " Alan Modra
2016-03-10 9:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-03-11 20:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-11 22:16 ` Alan Modra
2016-03-11 23:13 ` Alan Modra
2016-03-12 7:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-03-12 8:26 ` Jeff Law
2016-03-12 9:07 ` Alan Modra
2016-03-12 9:29 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-03-12 11:10 ` Richard Biener
2016-03-12 17:07 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2016-03-14 9:56 ` Richard Biener
2016-03-14 19:00 ` Jeff Law
2016-03-15 2:27 ` Alan Modra
2016-03-15 12:17 ` Bernd Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E44CBD.6010806@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=bschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).