From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 52189 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2016 15:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 52170 invoked by uid 89); 14 Mar 2016 15:29:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=deprecate X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:29:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE422804F9; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-6-80.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.80]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2EFSxUE012074; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:29:00 -0400 Subject: Re: Wonly-top-basic-asm To: David Wohlferd , Bernd Edlinger , Sandra Loosemore , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <56A54EF9.8060006@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56A61442.3090803@redhat.com> <56A9C134.1030500@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56B80F57.9020606@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BBCC90.9020001@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BCAB73.20506@redhat.com> <56BD8427.4050405@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56BDD550.3050908@redhat.com> <56BE80F4.6060803@codesourcery.com> <56BFFBD9.7010202@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56C7BB50.4000909@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56C99113.7090602@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56D06AC1.7090607@redhat.com> <56D3ECEE.4050503@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56E21779.4020804@LimeGreenSocks.com> Cc: Richard Henderson , "jason@redhat.com" , "segher@kernel.crashing.org" , "Paul_Koning@Dell.com" , Jeff Law , Andrew Haley , "hubicka@ucw.cz" From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <56E6D8BB.3060507@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E21779.4020804@LimeGreenSocks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00775.txt.bz2 On 03/11/2016 01:55 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: > So, we have been discussing this issue for 4 months now. Over that > time, I have tried to incorporate everyone's feedback. > > As a result we have gone from a tiny doc patch (just describe the > current semantics), to a big doc patch (completely deprecate basic asm > when used in a function) to a medium doc patch + code fix (warning when > using basic asm in a function) and now back to a > slightly-bigger-than-tiny doc patch. > > I have made no changes since the last patch I posted > (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01406.html) for the > reasons discussed below. > > I assert that this patch both contains important information users need > and is better than the current text. I expect that Sandra is prepared > to check this in as soon as someone signs off on its technical accuracy. The example is not good, as discussed previously, and IMO the best option is to remove it. Otherwise I have no objections to the latest variant. Bernd